DRSC launches to date
Posted 06-29-2011 at 09:12 AM by communist
1:during launch a guidance system failed,sending the spacecraft on a flight to the capitol of the country,security measures were implemented and guidance systems were upgraded.1/14/85
2:First launch from Union Spaceport,suborbital.6/5/85
3:explosion on pad,space program suspended temporarily.1/13/86
4:First sucessful orbital flight.12/20/88
5-20:orbital flight tests.3/15/89 - 2/11/93
21-38:geostationary orbital tests,low priority until announcement of new subprogram.4/12/94 - 2/5/99
39:subprogram flight 1,crashed in hevaily populated area,review board says space program is safe and flights continue.5/30/01
40-45:SF 2-6,sucsessful HEO tests.9/5/02-10/5/07
41:subprogram enters into lunar orbit with flight 7.5/26/08
42-45:continued lunar flights.6/5/09 - 8/10/10
46:last subprogram flight.12/25/10
the above is a summary of flights conducted by the DRSC
DRSC Executive office
2:First launch from Union Spaceport,suborbital.6/5/85
3:explosion on pad,space program suspended temporarily.1/13/86
4:First sucessful orbital flight.12/20/88
5-20:orbital flight tests.3/15/89 - 2/11/93
21-38:geostationary orbital tests,low priority until announcement of new subprogram.4/12/94 - 2/5/99
39:subprogram flight 1,crashed in hevaily populated area,review board says space program is safe and flights continue.5/30/01
40-45:SF 2-6,sucsessful HEO tests.9/5/02-10/5/07
41:subprogram enters into lunar orbit with flight 7.5/26/08
42-45:continued lunar flights.6/5/09 - 8/10/10
46:last subprogram flight.12/25/10
the above is a summary of flights conducted by the DRSC
DRSC Executive office
Total Comments 12
Comments
-
I'm not sure the people who were affected by this would agree that it is safe.Quote:39:subprogram flight 1,crashed in hevaily populated area,review board says space program is safe and flights continue.5/30/01Posted 06-29-2011 at 10:02 AM by garyw 
-
Yeah, especially after these ==^Quote:1:during launch a guidance system failed,sending the spacecraft on a flight to the capitol of the country,security measures were implemented and guidance systems were upgraded.1/14/85
3:explosion on pad,space program suspended temporarily.1/13/86
39:subprogram flight 1,crashed in hevaily populated area,review board says space program is safe and flights continue.5/30/01Posted 06-29-2011 at 02:22 PM by ky
-
no one was killed in these incidentsPosted 06-29-2011 at 07:17 PM by communist
-
what about contamination?
Posted 06-29-2011 at 08:34 PM by garyw
-
i was not there, so i have no knowledge on wether there was contaminationQuote:Originally Posted by garyw
what about contamination?Posted 06-29-2011 at 09:12 PM by communist
Updated 06-29-2011 at 09:13 PM by communist (removed sad story) -
Could you post the review boards investigation document?
Posted 06-29-2011 at 09:25 PM by garyw
-
the document is not avaible im sorryQuote:Originally Posted by garyw
Could you post the review boards investigation document?
Posted 06-29-2011 at 09:29 PM by communist
-
as a response,the review boards,who were headed by Tri-State insurance,did not produce a document,to my knowledge,regarding these accidents.what likely happned was an report was sent to the president and he/she discarded it,i will remind the vice president to produce a report on the next accident.Quote:Originally Posted by communist
the document is not avaible im sorry
Posted 06-29-2011 at 09:55 PM by communist
-
Wait... is this a VSA?Posted 07-06-2011 at 10:43 PM by RisingFury
-
no,it is not,it is a history of the DRSC's launchesQuote:Originally Posted by RisingFury
Wait... is this a VSA?
Posted 07-07-2011 at 05:07 PM by communist
-
Well, if its not a vsa.... what is it?Posted 07-07-2011 at 08:55 PM by Eli13
-
it is a countrys space program,i summed it up in a small amount of words(read:paragraph)Quote:Originally Posted by Eli13
Well, if its not a vsa.... what is it?
Posted 07-17-2011 at 07:59 AM by communist
