Orbiter-Forum  

Go Back   Orbiter-Forum > Orbiter Space Flight Simulator > Orbiter Web Forum > Orbiter Forum Space Station
Register Blogs Orbinauts List Social Groups FAQ Projects Mark Forums Read

Orbiter Forum Space Station Project news & discussions for all OFSS versions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-22-2011, 05:47 PM   #106
Tex
Webmaster
 
Tex's Avatar

Default

Question now is, do we re-fly the mission or just leave the station in this inclination? Thoughts anyone?

EDIT - Maybe a "rescue" type flight is added with no payload, just an XR5 sent up to fix the orbit?
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 08-22-2011, 05:57 PM   #107
kevin580
Orbinaut
 
kevin580's Avatar
Default

Ah, yes, I remember...After I changed the plane, it began to change by itself. What to do now? The Idea with the rescue mission sounds good.
kevin580 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2011, 05:58 PM   #108
Scav
Mostly Harmless
 
Scav's Avatar
Default

I suppose an orbital maintenance flight could be barfed up at this time. ESA's bird is still at Wideawake, but I'd imagine it wouldn't take too much to reconfig it for orbital flight.

After all, there's LOADS of cargo space inside the crew area for storing miscellaneous supplies for the station as it sits.
Scav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2011, 06:06 PM   #109
kevin580
Orbinaut
 
kevin580's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
 Hey Kevin.. You didn't adjust the orbital inclination of the station. You were supposed to press the 'FRM' button on the Orbit MFD as instructed in the document so that you change it to Equatorial frame before adjusting the plane. The station is supposed to be in 51.60 degrees inclination from an equatorial frame. You can see in the screen shot below where I highlighted the frame button displaying the equatorial frame now and the inclination is not on 51.60.

{image}
Forgot to say, I did the same and then changed the plane. After I was ready, the plane changed by itself
kevin580 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2011, 07:21 PM   #110
garyw
O-F Administrator
 
garyw's Avatar


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
 Question now is, do we re-fly the mission or just leave the station in this inclination? Thoughts anyone?

EDIT - Maybe a "rescue" type flight is added with no payload, just an XR5 sent up to fix the orbit?
Depends how realistic you want it. Personally I'd say consider this a glitch and fly the missions with the station in this inclination. Add another mission to fix this problem or add the task to a mission further down the line.

I think that OFSS needs a few problems like this to keep it interesting. If all missions go perfectly were is the fun & realism?

Last edited by garyw; 08-22-2011 at 07:28 PM.
garyw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2011, 08:01 PM   #111
Tex
Webmaster
 
Tex's Avatar

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin580 View Post
 Forgot to say, I did the same and then changed the plane. After I was ready, the plane changed by itself
With all realism settings active and with orbit stabilization turn off, yes your orbit will change some. However, the inclination won't change from 51.60 to 56.72 in the time slot with which your flight was scheduled.

No worries, we'll sort it out. As I am fixing to post in reply to Gary below...


Quote:
Originally Posted by garyw View Post
 Depends how realistic you want it. Personally I'd say consider this a glitch and fly the missions with the station in this inclination. Add another mission to fix this problem or add the task to a mission further down the line.

I think that OFSS needs a few problems like this to keep it interesting. If all missions go perfectly were is the fun & realism?
I completely agree and is the reason I continued after Phantom's flight instead of re-flying it. My worry now is how it would affect future flights as the mass increases, the plane becomes a lot harder to adjust except in small amounts. I think some sort of added "rescue" flight will be the best and most realistic solution in order to get the inclination closer to where it should be before the station mass gets too big.

I'm still tossing the ideas around in my head. I need to run some new tests with this current inclination.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 08-22-2011, 10:12 PM   #112
Wood
Orbinaut
Default

I'd suggest splitting Flight 9 (HabMod5 + URMS3 + Artemis + PMA) into two flights, and using the resulting prop margin in each to correct the orbit. Seems better than sending one up empty.
Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 12:23 AM   #113
Scav
Mostly Harmless
 
Scav's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood View Post
 I'd suggest splitting Flight 9 (HabMod5 + URMS3 + Artemis + PMA) into two flights, and using the resulting prop margin in each to correct the orbit. Seems better than sending one up empty.
I'd be up for that.
Scav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 12:47 AM   #114
Tex
Webmaster
 
Tex's Avatar

Default

If you're good, we may be able to do the inclination change with flight 9 as it is. I'll test it later, I'm just off for a few mile run in a bit.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 12:57 AM   #115
Scav
Mostly Harmless
 
Scav's Avatar
Default

Hey! What are you running from?



The only variable I see is, how much room in the cargo bay is the existing consist going to take? Can we squeeze in a few extra canisters of propellant in the back?
Scav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 04:40 AM   #116
Tex
Webmaster
 
Tex's Avatar

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav View Post
 Hey! What are you running from?

Not from; rather for myself because I love to run, for my health, and possibly for a marathon next year if my right leg allows me. I'm just now pushing myself to the 6 mile mark, haven't quite made it yet.


Quote:
The only variable I see is, how much room in the cargo bay is the existing consist going to take? Can we squeeze in a few extra canisters of propellant in the back?
Well it may be possible to do it with no extra fuel, however I suspect it'll be too close for comfort even if you could. I thought about adding some extra fuel containers as well which should work with your payload. I know it won't be a problem with weight, just unsure how many you will be able to carry in the extra space. Two extra fuel containers should be enough in any case which I don't foresee a problem fitting in with your space station cargo.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 08-23-2011, 10:57 AM   #117
garyw
O-F Administrator
 
garyw's Avatar


Default

add it as an option to a couple of missions and set a flight rule that the plane change can only be carried out if a certain quantity of prop is in reserve.
garyw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 04:28 PM   #118
Scav
Mostly Harmless
 
Scav's Avatar
Default

Tex,

My wife and I have an in-joke . . . whenever we see a runner (at a lake, on a trail, etc), we like to imagine a monster following close behind them.

It kinda keeps life interesting at times.
Scav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 05:56 PM   #119
Tex
Webmaster
 
Tex's Avatar

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyw View Post
 add it as an option to a couple of missions and set a flight rule that the plane change can only be carried out if a certain quantity of prop is in reserve.
I don't think that will be necessary as there should be plenty of room to carry extra XR5 fuel containers in the cargo bay with flight #9. Given the amount it is off, certainly the major part of the plane change really needs to be done on flight 9. If anything, I'd almost rather see us compromise on a new inclination between the planned 51.60 and where it is now.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 04:30 AM   #120
Scav
Mostly Harmless
 
Scav's Avatar
Default

One thing I'm a little hazy on:

How much of the cargo bay will the original consist take?

Because, putting it in a nerdy way, I can't imagine it'd be that difficult to dedicate the aft-most cells to fuel storage. Even if they're stacked on all three tiers.

The piping, of course, is modular (and not really modeled in this case).

That, I think, would ensure enough propellant to effect the necessary inclination change with fuel to spare (unless I happen to have a really nasty run of bad luck, of course).
Scav is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Orbiter-Forum > Orbiter Space Flight Simulator > Orbiter Web Forum > Orbiter Forum Space Station


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Quick Links Need Help?


About Us | Rules & Guidelines | TOS Policy | Privacy Policy

Orbiter-Forum is hosted at Orbithangar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 - 2012, Orbiter-Forum.com. All rights reserved.