Recent content by ZacharyS41

The scenario you attached still isn't working. However, I forgot to mention that I have the Falcon Heavy addon and I swapped the SLC-40 pad from the Falcon 9R V1.2 addon with the pad from the Falcon Heavy addon. It works great with the Falcon Heavy SLC-40 pad. To reiterate, I think something...

I personally think it has to do with the SLC-40 config in the scenario file because if I changed the launch pad to 39A, the scenario runs great.

I duplicated a TestSat config file (i.e. 6300_sat) in the vanilla Falcon 9 v1.2 addon pack, renamed it to Zuma (which is in the "Payloads" folder I created), and changed the mass to just over 1,100 kilograms.

However, a different scenario of Falcon 9 launching Inmarsat-5 F4 from LC-39A works perfectly. To be clear, all launch scenarios from 39A work while SLC-40 scenarios just close before the actual game begins.

I did a fresh install of Orbiter 2016, and I'm attempting to run a scenario of Falcon 9 launching from SLC-40 with Zuma. It appears to be loading well, but then the program closes automatically with no error message. What is the problem?

(y)

BrianJ, I have a suggestion to add on to the Starlink mod. I've been simulating Starlink v2 Mini launches by having each Starlink weigh 800 kg (typical Starlink v2 Mini individual mass) despite them being in their v1.5 config. A Starlink v2 Mini satellite is essentially twice the size of a...

Luis is saying, "It failed me when I changed it." in regards to utilizing the sooty B0158 textures for the missions mentioned by Kyle.

Luis is asking, "How can I create the recently released Transporter-8 & CRS-28 missions in the game?"

I have another suggestion to propose: Recently, SpaceX debuted a shorter M-Vac nozzle; which, and I quote from https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/7014: "This launch will feature a new MVac nozzle extension design aimed at increasing cadence and reducing costs. This new nozzle...

I have a suggestion to make: Can you make a Cargo Dragon variant of the spacecraft? It only has two fins and no SuperDraco engines. Also, is the Cargo Dragon mass (capsule, trunk, & propellant) the same as Crew Dragon?

Is there a download link within this thread for the most up-to-date D3D9 Client? I'm not referring to the one on the download page; is it somewhere in the most recent thread pages?

If it effects landing targeting, it's understandable why it kinda won't work. My idea was just an option. Not trying to make you oblige.

The 1-3-1 engine landing burn was done on the early GTO missions (i.e. SES-9, Thaicom 8) as well as the Falcon Heavy side booster and center core landings.

Just to simply simulate a last-minute landing burn below 2 km altitude.