Recent content by richfororbit

While having search Grusch a few times on bing. The italian UFO crash back in 1933, is speculated to be that of the Nazi bell an experimental vehicle built by the reich's engineers who were wondering on how to get to orbit. Apparently, anybody who got to close it, would cause serious injury...

Hehe The guy was wrong on population, more than eight billion plus on the planet at the moment. Not six billion. Yeah, real groovy.:whistle:

I thought it was worth posting, like the helium three discussion, owning the moon and explorting, and resources, still sometime off. Not scientific info on the moon. Mainly a political academic view not a great lot spoken about it.

I read this via a reddit topic. Nothing new. The second is pretty out of this world. The first point, may explain why Astronauts couldn't see anything. But other than that. The rest is his view based on others views.

The House Oversight Committee members are set to undergo a classified briefing on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena in the days ahead. The Office of House Security, will be conducted by the Office of Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, Thomas A. Monheim.

This episode from the series Enterprise aired in early 2003, was what jogged my memory on Grusch's testimony. While as far as I know, he never mentioned any details on crashed vehicles, this at least resonates with what he said. I read somewhere that a crashsed craft had an inside that was...

The triangle video could've of been a drone. As for the fighter jet plane view, if there are four crew with two planes, couldn't there be cameras setup in the fighter jets to record all angles of these objects, as the former pilot mentioned. It could give clearer view of those objects seen like...

I found this old thread, I thought may as well post the recent UAP congress clip. Those David Grusch, the fact that he claims non human could mean anything. And known for ninety years. Reminds me of the episode where the borg are found in the Arctic circle in Season 2 of Enterprise. Just...

And the NBC correspondent doesn't think any Astronauts will be going to Mars by 2040. Using Nuclear will be the way to get there what ever decade. I gave this a watch, so the professor of Rochester University gives view That is decades away.

What are you getting at exactly? The second mission is the orbit, and that crew selected will be the landing crew, I guess, so who would be after that crew? The gateway was part of this program. The south pole was where an outpost was considered. The landing site I think is there for Artemis 3.

Apparently Trappist 1B which was already known too be too hot for any real atmophere, it can't be ruled out there isn't one. So the webb and the spitzer telescopes have determined this. Forty light years away. The trappist system has seven planets, and three out of the seven may be promising...

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/04/world/exoplanet-radio-signal-scn/index.html

The probes couldn't travel to Pluto. That is the point. They couldn't do anything without more thrust and fuel, and even then still need a power supply to keep transmitting. Otherwise, they could travel through the oort cloud and there in half the travel time in order to leave. Why three...

Could be good for propulsion reasons. Testing out a new chemical engine that would take a probe there as its destination. And so on.