• ORBITER-FORUM will be temporarily closed at 2026-07-23 18:00 UTC while we complete some OF maintenance tasks. The amount of downtime is expected to take up to one hour, but probably less.

Search results

  1. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    Will do!
  2. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    Yeah n7275 cleared up exactly what I mean
  3. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    I still think some values between 10 and 100 should be there to click for ease of use like before.
  4. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    I did notice on this rework the time acceleration menu is now missing graduations between 10 and 100, it would be useful to at the very least add a 50 or detents of some sort in there and perhaps an entry box to type a speed in like what existed before?
  5. rcflyinghokie

    V8 Release Work Thread

    A little late to adding this, I apologize, but Apollo 8 now has an additional MCC state for a TLI+11 pad added per the actual flight. If you have a current Apollo 8 save between TLI and LOI-1 update pad, you will need to bump your mission state up by 1. You can do this by editing your scenario...
  6. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    As I asked before, can you post a scenario where you are having the issue? There are a number of things you could be doing wrong here.
  7. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    My plus minus is back :)
  8. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    Sure let me give it a whirl today, will report back!
  9. rcflyinghokie

    NASSP install

    Pop into discord we have all the steps to get you going on orbiter 2024 :) https://discord.com/invite/9PnBbt38U2
  10. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    The files with the text in question are excel files, so I am not sure what exactly I can change in those.
  11. rcflyinghokie

    UI rework

    Not sure how this is handled, but we just noticed the ± symbol is now being rendered as a ? symbol in our checklist MFD after these updates. Additionally the degree symbol is having the same issue...a pretty important one for a space flight simulator ;)
  12. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    Also jump in our discord, we can help a lot faster there in the nassp channel!
  13. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    Hard to say without looking, do you have a scenario I can look at?
  14. rcflyinghokie

    A11 and the first P52 - maneuvers?

    After observing the SIVB they performed P52, in all likelyhood they didnt have to maneuver to get good stars as most attitudes in cislunar space had an acceptable pair of stars. P23 P52 did not need an attitude change, P23 has an automaneuver component so it gives you the attitude and allows...
  15. rcflyinghokie

    A11 and the first P52 - maneuvers?

    What's the question about it? We have done many platform alignments.
  16. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    You shouldn't need to V49 anywhere for P23 on 8, the program calculates your angles. The maneuver to sighting attitude was generally either an attitude read up or, in the case of 8, the crew maneuvering to an attitude that places the star and earth/moon on the correct side of the spacecraft...
  17. rcflyinghokie

    No graphics

    We have all this information in our discord. There are a number of options that need to be enabled for an OO x64 build with NASSP 9. Assuming you have OO x64, the textures, and the correct NASSP branch from my github https://github.com/rcflyinghokie/NASSP/releases Do the following: Launch...
  18. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    if you are getting a opr error and key release you are entering something in the wrong place. You need to fill all 3 registers correctly on the N70 (star, landmark, horizon) Also are you trying to use a + or - in those registers?
  19. rcflyinghokie

    P40 help

    I am not quite sure what you mean about "loads V37" When you call P23, you will get a F 05 70 and that's where you load the codes. Sounds like you are trying to call V25 at another display?
  20. rcflyinghokie

    No graphics

    64 bit orbiter is on orbiters github
Back
Top