Search results

It's aliiive. Now I'll have to decide between floppy disk and casettes for Orbiter. I guess it depends on the number of truckloads 😂

I occasionally play games on my phone, a pretty much standard Samsung. There is a reason most ports fail to gain traction on mobile, and that is the lack of proper control options. Even on consoles, it's a bit of a stretch for some games, especially flight sims. You just can't beat mouse and...

Heard a commentator say that they're 'purposefully pushing the ship beyond its limits'. Those limits that it more or less failed once or twice beforrle Edit: the Starlink panels on Starship, while probably useful, look like pure Kerbal engineering

I'm still not sure what to make of it. If they don't solve the boil-off issues, even if they manage to get to the moon.

Sadly, I don't quite see that happening. Congress has a history of scuppering projects. Too short sighted and concerned about their own local fanbase

Maybe they can build one which can weathervane, so it will always be shielded by the tower when it comes down. Not sure how much explosive power it still has, but even the flames touching the tower looked like it could have done some damage

Amazing flight. Perhaps I shouldn't be disappointed, but it kinda nags me that , technically speaking, this is the fifth test where the Starship itself falls short of what they're trying to achieve, not to mention no on-orbit engine restart. As it looks like now, even if they may be able to...

Kinda looks better than the last one, so far

So they didn't end up testing the raptors in space?

Same goes for Buran. But, then again, it wasn't necessarily a technological issue, but more of a case of the US always wanting to keep humans in the loop, while the Soviets wanted the complete opposite, lest someone decided to land in the USA or something