Please excuse me if this seems like a new boy trying to change the rules. I am very new to Orbiter but this is in no way meant to start a flame war.
My question comes from 3 starting points.
1) A lot of Orbiter seems to be based in the future. ( I know there is a lot of Apollo stuff, I watched the boys do their stuff live, so no disrespect intended.)
2) Most craft are landing from very high and very fast entry way points.
3) As opposed to "general aviation", there are few points on the earth where they can / would land. It follows there are few points which they use as waypoints.
My idea would then be to reduce the number of VORs available but give them longer ranges, i.e. 500km.
By commenting out most of the VOR's in the /config/earth.cfg and altering the ranges of others in the south of england, I get a better chance of setting up an approach to london heathrow. Looking at the map of the Cape area is just a sea of Vors.
I accept that I can do what I like to MY installation but I raise this to the kind souls who write the MFD's that I use, to see if this idea has legs.
I know VHF is line of sight, but from 10(plus)km up you can see a fair way. With phased array aerials you could increase apparent power from the transmitter.
Again I accept that using dead reckoning I can ( with your help and MFDs) leave the ISS and land at the Cape, SO LONG as I wait for the exact right time to undock. How do I leave at noon (gmt) and land in india ??
So I am thinking I need 50 Long Range VOR's not 3 in a 10km area.
Hope all that makes sense and I would welcome your views
My question comes from 3 starting points.
1) A lot of Orbiter seems to be based in the future. ( I know there is a lot of Apollo stuff, I watched the boys do their stuff live, so no disrespect intended.)
2) Most craft are landing from very high and very fast entry way points.
3) As opposed to "general aviation", there are few points on the earth where they can / would land. It follows there are few points which they use as waypoints.
My idea would then be to reduce the number of VORs available but give them longer ranges, i.e. 500km.
By commenting out most of the VOR's in the /config/earth.cfg and altering the ranges of others in the south of england, I get a better chance of setting up an approach to london heathrow. Looking at the map of the Cape area is just a sea of Vors.
I accept that I can do what I like to MY installation but I raise this to the kind souls who write the MFD's that I use, to see if this idea has legs.
I know VHF is line of sight, but from 10(plus)km up you can see a fair way. With phased array aerials you could increase apparent power from the transmitter.
Again I accept that using dead reckoning I can ( with your help and MFDs) leave the ISS and land at the Cape, SO LONG as I wait for the exact right time to undock. How do I leave at noon (gmt) and land in india ??
So I am thinking I need 50 Long Range VOR's not 3 in a 10km area.
Hope all that makes sense and I would welcome your views