Starting from LOI-1, CMC controlled SPS burns try to apply too much dV. On LOI-1, Noun 81 and dVT tallies with the PADs but Noun 42 shows a negative Hp.
During the burn, Noun 40 R1 shows a burn time of almost 9min, compared to about 5.5min on the PAD. R2 and R3 correlates with EMS quite closely. If I don't perform a MTVC, the CMC doesn't shut down the SPS when N42 R2 reaches 0ft/s.
During TEI, the DAP just completely loses control of the CSM. Attitude rates build up so quickly that I don't even have time to take control with MTVC.
Same issue also happens as LOI. Computed burn time is about 5.5min for a 3min burn.
Scenarios are in a .zip format since they exceed the forum's limit of 195kb
View attachment Apollo 10 scenarios.zip
During the burn, Noun 40 R1 shows a burn time of almost 9min, compared to about 5.5min on the PAD. R2 and R3 correlates with EMS quite closely. If I don't perform a MTVC, the CMC doesn't shut down the SPS when N42 R2 reaches 0ft/s.
During TEI, the DAP just completely loses control of the CSM. Attitude rates build up so quickly that I don't even have time to take control with MTVC.
Same issue also happens as LOI. Computed burn time is about 5.5min for a 3min burn.
Scenarios are in a .zip format since they exceed the forum's limit of 195kb
View attachment Apollo 10 scenarios.zip