Feedback D3D9Client progress

Which D3D9Client feels (is?!) better?

  • A, definitely!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A didn't work for me :(

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B didn't work for me :(

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
  • Poll closed .

kuddel

Donator
Donator
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
449
Points
83
Hi there,

I was fiddling around some optimizations for the D3D9Client build process lately and I now want to see whether it's worth it (or not).

So attached you'll find two versions of D3D9Client, A and B
One of them might perform better...
To not bias you in your experience, I'm not telling you which one is which :lol:

So would you please try them (both would be nice ;) ) and give some feedback?

Attention!
These builds are for Orbiter BETA (r65)!

/Kuddel
 

Attachments

  • A.zip
    1.8 MB · Views: 16
  • B.zip
    1.9 MB · Views: 13

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,335
Reaction score
611
Points
203
So I tested both A and B and on my machine, the B version worked the best. The A version was closer to the actual R25.2 for rev. 65. The B version was much smoother and loaded a bit faster as well.
 

jarmonik

Well-known member
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Beta Tester
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
2,491
Reaction score
600
Points
128
Website
users.kymp.net
I can't make any difference between the two.
 

GLS

Well-known member
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
5,367
Reaction score
2,260
Points
188
Website
github.com
Can't tell much difference between them.... A might load a tiny bit faster than B, and B might have about ~1% more fps than A.
I'm running W7 x64, window mode at 1200x675.
 
Top