Hello, :tiphat:
I have (had) 4 GB of RAM DDR3 1066, split in 2 chips, each installed on one of the 2 motherboard slots. I'm running on Win 7.
After a couple of years of random BSODs, I got fed up with that and removed the RAM chip which I was suspecting. So now I have a stable system, but which 2 GB of RAM only. I definitively feel the difference, especially when loading / copying big files.
So now I have to buy a new chip to replace the faulty one, but I wonder if I should get a 2 GB one or a 4 GB one. In this second case, I would have the working 2 GB chip + the new 4 GB chip, for a total of 6 GB of RAM. 6 is not a power of 2, is this important ?
Also the 2 GB chip that works is DDR3 1066. My MB supports DDR3 1333+, so I suspect the system would run better with a single 4 GB DDR3 1333 chip, rather than with 2 GB DDR3 1066 + 4 GB DDR3 1333 (the system will use the lowest frequency, right ?). I rule out the idea of buying two 2 x 4 GB DDR3 1333 RAM chips, I'm not going to invest that much money in an obsolete technology and just want to fix the issue I have.
So, any thoughts on this ? :hmm:
I have (had) 4 GB of RAM DDR3 1066, split in 2 chips, each installed on one of the 2 motherboard slots. I'm running on Win 7.
After a couple of years of random BSODs, I got fed up with that and removed the RAM chip which I was suspecting. So now I have a stable system, but which 2 GB of RAM only. I definitively feel the difference, especially when loading / copying big files.
So now I have to buy a new chip to replace the faulty one, but I wonder if I should get a 2 GB one or a 4 GB one. In this second case, I would have the working 2 GB chip + the new 4 GB chip, for a total of 6 GB of RAM. 6 is not a power of 2, is this important ?
Also the 2 GB chip that works is DDR3 1066. My MB supports DDR3 1333+, so I suspect the system would run better with a single 4 GB DDR3 1333 chip, rather than with 2 GB DDR3 1066 + 4 GB DDR3 1333 (the system will use the lowest frequency, right ?). I rule out the idea of buying two 2 x 4 GB DDR3 1333 RAM chips, I'm not going to invest that much money in an obsolete technology and just want to fix the issue I have.
So, any thoughts on this ? :hmm:
Last edited: