- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 37,588
- Reaction score
- 2,312
- Points
- 203
- Location
- Wolfsburg
- Preferred Pronouns
- Sire
Lets assume, we use a system based on a fixed number of attachments, which can partially get moved. Lets assume also, that the payload attachments will be at the end of the parent->child attachment list. The order of the attachments shall stay constant over a long time.
So, which P->C attachments do we need? my proposal:
Fixed:
0. RMS End-effector
1. OBSS
2. MMU1 (historic, do we need them?)
3. MMU2
4. Docking port Aux (allow us simulating soft docking)
dynamic centerline payloads, controlled by the payload 1-3 interfaces
5. Payload 1
6. Payload 2
7. Payload 3.
Static centerline Payloads:
8. Static C/L payload 1
9. Static C/L payload 2
10. Static C/L payload 3.
Pseudo static Port sill payloads (Are static inside the Shuttle, but can later get separated by EVA)
11. Port static 1
12. Port Static 2
13. Port Static 3
The same starboard
14. Starboard Static 1
15. Starboard Static 2
16. Starboard Static 3
EDIT: Moved it out from the SSU thread, so we can work on it better here.
So, which P->C attachments do we need? my proposal:
Fixed:
0. RMS End-effector
1. OBSS
2. MMU1 (historic, do we need them?)
3. MMU2
4. Docking port Aux (allow us simulating soft docking)
dynamic centerline payloads, controlled by the payload 1-3 interfaces
5. Payload 1
6. Payload 2
7. Payload 3.
Static centerline Payloads:
8. Static C/L payload 1
9. Static C/L payload 2
10. Static C/L payload 3.
Pseudo static Port sill payloads (Are static inside the Shuttle, but can later get separated by EVA)
11. Port static 1
12. Port Static 2
13. Port Static 3
The same starboard
14. Starboard Static 1
15. Starboard Static 2
16. Starboard Static 3
EDIT: Moved it out from the SSU thread, so we can work on it better here.
Last edited: