OK.. first. The idea of this challenge is to make everyone better, not to tear one down.
The challenge isn't one target, it's many.
Find historical flights that aren't already "missions" (conditions and parameters already exist in the game) and the attitudes and burn rates they used. The angles of orbit they burned from....everything that can be feasibly followed...
And see how accurate the flight is without deviating or correcting it.
For instance, following every burn for Apollo 15...the Moon's position at launch can be approximately known so can wait for it to be where it was during launch day...then proceed.
With REENTRY ... I haven't played with Mission planner. If you can't just set the correct moon-earth parameters, then just time elapse.
That would give an interesting stress test on REENTRY's memory because at 280+ flight hours I think it started to get lag. It's obviously not necessary to optimize for a 15 day flight for missions that took only 6 days?
If you can set mission parameters. Do things like "moon rise at Jun 10. Then set the moon to where it is Jun 5th and time elapse to see when the moon breaks the horizon.
Let's TEST your long distance super massive particle physics too....not everything has to be done in flight. ?
The challenge isn't one target, it's many.
Find historical flights that aren't already "missions" (conditions and parameters already exist in the game) and the attitudes and burn rates they used. The angles of orbit they burned from....everything that can be feasibly followed...
And see how accurate the flight is without deviating or correcting it.
For instance, following every burn for Apollo 15...the Moon's position at launch can be approximately known so can wait for it to be where it was during launch day...then proceed.
With REENTRY ... I haven't played with Mission planner. If you can't just set the correct moon-earth parameters, then just time elapse.
That would give an interesting stress test on REENTRY's memory because at 280+ flight hours I think it started to get lag. It's obviously not necessary to optimize for a 15 day flight for missions that took only 6 days?
If you can set mission parameters. Do things like "moon rise at Jun 10. Then set the moon to where it is Jun 5th and time elapse to see when the moon breaks the horizon.
Let's TEST your long distance super massive particle physics too....not everything has to be done in flight. ?