Jake
Deorbinaut
Just popping in to ask if this idea is still alive?
Couldn't you just use [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3262"]UniversalCargoDeck[/ame] for this? It allows to near-effortlessly attach a vessel to another vessel, control the position/rotation, and it stays attached until you want to detach it. I don't see how that couldn't work for attaching space station modules to a core vessel in orbit.
I know this is slightly off the topic but in trying to find a simple work around to Kaito’s original question I came up with this.
Also, I am not a programmer so I have no Idea how complicated what I will suggest might be but last night using 2552’s idea using the [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3262"]UniversalCargoDeck[/ame] to merge multiple pieces, I built on the surface of the moon a structure consisting of 19 pieces. I had thought a while ago that being able to take the same pieces that I was using to build a space station and transfer them to the moon and build an initial settlement that way would be neat. However, when I tried to get the pieces to dock I kept running into problems. I think I would get pieces to far below the surface and the program would make them bounce into orbit.
I solved this by simply using the [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3262"]UniversalCargoDeck[/ame] to build the structure and just butt the pieces up against each other however I wanted. I had mounted the cargo deck on a UMMU Shuttle so that I could hide the main craft and got an unexpected ability. I can now put my UMMUs into my structure.
So here was my thought. While this does not solve the problem of having dozens of craft in my F3 box to select from. It did occur to me that if you manage to build an MFD or some linking craft that hides all the parts of the superstructure. First, would it be compatible with the cargo deck or have the ability to similarly attach objects.
Second could it be made to support UMMUs.
Third could it be made to run out of air. (last one would be kind of neat as it would require the need for resupply runs) .
Thanks