Yeah, I think I failed in all of the above, as after MC-4 I'm almost 500Km away from the ISS :facepalm:, although it was close enough to be seen about 2 or 3 orbits ago. Anyway, not (super) bad for my first run... :shifty:
Very good MFD!
Yeah, it's definitely not easy to use, but it's closely modeled on what the actual Shuttle FDOs used, so, it's their fault, not mine, haha. And here I thought they would improve the user friendliness of the calculation tools since Apollo, but I guess not. When more issues of the MFD are fixed it should be a quite powerful tool for all kinds of rendezvous planning.
And you will definitely have to recalculate the plan after each maneuver. Even with near perfect execution there will be small difference that propagate to something significant over such a long period of time. Especially critical is the NH type maneuver on rendezvous day, you'll phase far away from the ISS again if the TIG is off by just a few seconds of what it should be.
The best instruction manual is the FDO Console Handbook that you can get if you have a L2 subscription on NASA Spaceflight. I really wish it was public, there are detailed instructions on how to calculate each type of maneuver and so much other stuff. Once the next update is ready I'll probably give a walkthrough of a whole rendezvous with each step I have done, and not just for the initial planning before OMS-2.
EDIT: Released another version of the MFD:
https://github.com/indy91/Shuttle-FDO-MFD/releases/tag/0.1.2-alpha The changes are, roughly:
-Better iteration behavior
-Nonspherical gravity is better supported now, but probably still not as good as it should be
-Saving/loading of rendezvous plans
-Improved spacing between maneuvers on the maneuver evaluation table
-STS-114 and STS-126 files with rendezvous profile loaded
-Various fixes
I have attached the STS-114 scenario I talked about a few days ago. It's basically the STS-114 Post OMS-2 scenario that comes with SSU, except that it got an updated ISS state vector from Two-Line Elements. Shuttle SV is as it was. With that and nonspherical gravity enabled the predicted necessary plane change is below 10 ft/s. I'll test fly STS-114 if that actually is the case. So scenario wise the two scenarios I have posted so far are for testing of the nonspherical gravity logic diabled (STS-126) and enabled (STS-114).