- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 37,671
- Reaction score
- 2,399
- Points
- 203
- Location
- Wolfsburg
- Preferred Pronouns
- Sire
Typical microsoft. :facepalm:
Yeah. But it isn't a really bad language. It has weaknesses and the pool of available libraries is pretty small compared to Java, but you can still find enough libraries for a task (though often with a beta status).
But it should be more than good enough for our task.
I am still not sure if it would make sense to integrate some network client into it for displaying live data from a simulation. Maybe a special client would be the better choice then.
For the GPC improvements, I slowly get back to work here after my vacation. Debugging the GPC software is one design aspect right now, we need some tools there to allow verifying the software. Another design choice is "internal DSL" (hardcoded programs in C++ using an internal API) vs "external DSL" (Script files using an external API). The internal would be a bit less effort to implement, but the external version would be more comfortable for debugging and testing.