Request Artemis landers

[gattispilot]

So this is the VB TD info and seems to work
TDP_1_0_POS = 0 -0.6 3.3
TDP_1_0_STIFFNESS = 6540
TDP_1_0_DAMPING = 4603.22
TDP_1_0_MU = 0.1
TDP_1_0_MULNG = 0.2

TDP_1_1_POS = -2.59808 -0.6 -1.5
TDP_1_1_STIFFNESS = 6540
TDP_1_1_DAMPING = 4603.22
TDP_1_1_MU = 3
TDP_1_1_MULNG = 0.2

TDP_1_2_POS = 2.59808 -0.6 -1.5
TDP_1_2_STIFFNESS = 6540
TDP_1_2_DAMPING = 4603.22
TDP_1_2_MU = 3
TDP_1_2_MULNG = 0.2

TDP_1_3_POS = 0 3 0
TDP_1_3_STIFFNESS = 6540
TDP_1_3_DAMPING = 4603.22
TDP_1_3_MU = 3
TDP_1_3_MULNG = 0.2

But when I code it it is bad.
void LEVA::SetTDVTXStuff()
{
//double x_target = -0.5;
double stiffness = 6540;
double damping = 4603.22;
double ro = 3;
double Height_From_Ground = .6;
for (int i = 0; i < ntdvtx; i++)
{
tdvtx.damping = damping;
tdvtx.mu = 3;
tdvtx.mu_lng = .2;
tdvtx.stiffness = stiffness;
}
tdvtx[0].pos.x = cos(30 * RAD) * ro;
tdvtx[0].pos.y = -Height_From_Ground;
tdvtx[0].pos.z = -sin(30 * RAD) * ro;
tdvtx[1].pos.x = 0;
tdvtx[1].pos.y = -Height_From_Ground;
tdvtx[1].pos.z = 1 * ro;
tdvtx[2].pos.x = -cos(30 * RAD) * ro;
tdvtx[2].pos.y = -Height_From_Ground;
tdvtx[2].pos.z = -sin(30 * RAD) * ro;

SetTouchdownPoints(tdvtx, ntdvtx);
}

I wonder if I just set some TD and then somehow if the hammer is not attached it is forced landed?

 

[gattispilot]

Docking. I believe for the docking of the Orion to Mk2,.... there are dockign targets in the center of the dock, right? But from inside the capsule you would not see that. I know Apollo/skylab had target outside to align. I wonder if Mk2 would? Here my Orion is docked to ISS_HD. but I wonder what the circled parts are?

 

[gattispilot]

I need help on the the docking arrangement for MK2
I think this is correct but the petals on my dock maybe need to rotat 30degrees?

So then the Orion dock should align with the drawing, right?

I know for Apollo/Skylab there were docking targets you could see from the capsule window.

But for this dock I don't think that is the case, correct?

 

[gattispilot]

I saw these images. Still not sure about the direction of the dock. I saw where Orion was docked 90 degrees off the MK2?
@DaveS

 

[gattispilot]

I wonder if there is code to say if release then landed.
Here the eva buggy creates a shovel vessel on it td points. The guy gets it and moves. releases it and fall below the surface. the I use the scn editor to adjust the angle and now it is above the surface?

Or make the dampness and stiffness so no bounce?

 

[gattispilot]

So now we have the fueler,mk2 and mk1.

But no New Glenn to get them there.

 

[gattispilot]

I wonder/question the dock orientation. It I think I might be off 90 degrees? Took the images from a video on Artemis3.
and then from orbiter

 

[barrygolden]

the last picture looks spot on

 

[GLS]

Seems 90º off... the first 2 pictures show that, viewed from Orion, the rest of the Lander is towards the right.

 

[gattispilot]

I wonder which is correct

 

[barrygolden]

I don't think we know right now which would be right as a pilot if you rotated it 90* would be a little better just be sure to move your docking target to align with the Comander's window

I think they got thrown into this Artemis 3 mission at the last minute and were not at this point of docking

 

[gattispilot]

Adjusted the dock. But I think the docking target would now need to be on the strut?

I still got to do work on the moveable dock. It draws the ship to far into the ship. on reload it is good.

 

[MarkWatney2015]

Found this on Reddit. If correct, the transporter needs to be launched on a New Glenn with a longer fairing

 

[gattispilot]

Interesting. All the images I have seen is the MK1 had the cargo system on top.

 

[barrygolden]

that is MK 2 with the cargo being lowered

 

[gattispilot]

from the drawing the mk2 cargo is different. Wider base.,.....

but from most images it is the mk1 that uses that cargo system on top

 

[Spaceman 3D]

When launching the CT they most likely dont need a longer fairing since the tank is 7m wide like GS2. They'll need a shorther fairing sice only the top needs to be coverd

 

[Spaceman 3D]

from the drawing the mk2 cargo is different. Wider base.,.....

but from most images it is the mk1 that uses that cargo system on top

the base isn't wider its just shorther since the cargo Mk2 doesnt have a crew cabin. Mk2 also carries the cargo ontop.

 

[gattispilot]

So there are 2 mk2. crew and cargo.? but most images show mk1 with cargo