• ORBITER-FORUM will be temporarily closed at 2026-07-23 18:00 UTC while we complete some OF maintenance tasks. The amount of downtime is expected to take up to one hour, but probably less.

Gold: made from colliding dead stars

Andy44

owner: Oil Creek Astronautix
Addon Developer
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
7,618
Reaction score
7
Points
113
Location
In the Mid-Atlantic states
Earth's Gold May Come From Collisions of Dead Stars

http://news.yahoo.com/earths-gold-may-come-collisions-dead-stars-170544986.html

"We estimate that the amount of gold produced and ejected during the merger of the two neutron stars may be as large as 10 moon masses — quite a lot of bling!" lead author Edo Berger, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), said in a statement.


---------- Post added at 12:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 AM ----------

Just as an FYI, I hate the word "bling"...
 
Neutron stars are quite small. Imagine how rare a collision must be.
 
Neutron stars are quite small. Imagine how rare a collision must be.

Well there are binary neutron stars. And probably other systems that "lose" energy and must fall inward. I don't know what kind of tidal forces neutron stars would or wouldn't have though...
/speculating
 
How much gravity would our moon have if it was made out of solid gold? :hmm:
 
I also wonder how bright it would be in the sky. Maybe like a second, smaller Sun ?
 
And I thought that gold was created in a type of stellar explosion known as a supernova.
Is there a super computer capable enough to simulate this theory?
 
The processing power is probably a lesser problem than all the unknown variables involved in such a simulation. I don't think we know enough yet to create a precise model of such a collision.
 
Talk about oversupply!
 
How much gravity would our moon have if it was made out of solid gold? :hmm:

Using Orbiter's Moon radius we find the volume:

[math] V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3=\frac{4}{3}\pi \cdot(1.738\cdot 10^6)^3\simeq 2.199064\cdot 10^{19} \; m^3[/math]

Gold's density is [math] 19300 \; \frac{kg}{m^3}[/math]

So the mass of the Moon would be [math]19300 \cdot 2.199064\cdot 10^{19}=4.24419352\cdot 10^{23}\; kg[/math]

That's about 14 times less than the mass of the Earth and about 5.78 times more than the Moon's current mass.

The surface gravity is [math] g = \frac{GM}{R^2} = \frac{6.67259\cdot 10^{-11} \cdot 4.24419352\cdot 10^{23}}{(1.738\cdot 10^6)^2}\simeq 9.375 \; \frac{m}{s^2}\;\;\;[/math] which is about 96% of Earth's gravity.

That is not an accurate number of course, because it doesn't take into account the gravitational compression. A Moon volume of gold wouldn't be made of solid gold. The gold at the centre would be in liquid state, induced by the pressure of the rest of the gold around it. The liquid state has a larger volume. Larger volume = larger radius, thus the surface gravity would be smaller. (I don't think the gravity would be much smaller because this is an inverse cubed relationship).

-note to self #1: Learn more about gravitational compression and calculate the volume of the liquid state gold.
-note to self #2: Become a doctor and change last name to Acula.


More to the point, if you had a moon-mass of solid gold, how big would it be compared to the Moon.

Orbiter's Moon mass is [math]7.347664\cdot 10^{22} \; kg[/math]

With a gold density of [math] 19300\; {kg}{m^3}[/math] the volume would be:

[math] V = \frac{mass}{density}= \frac{7.347664\cdot 10^{22}}{19300}=3.8070797927461\cdot 10^{18} \; m^3[/math]

The radius is:
[math] V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3\Rightarrow R^3=\frac{V}{\frac{4}{3}\pi}\Rightarrow R=\left( \frac{V}{\frac{4}{3}\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}= \left( \frac{3.8070797927461\cdot 10^{18}}{\frac{4}{3}\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\simeq0.968652\cdot 10^6\; m[/math] which is about 56% of the Moon's current radius. I don't think there's a question about such an object's roundness, because of it's mass.

One question that wasn't asked was "How much would that amount of bling bling bl*slap face* be worth?"

With today's prices (~1295 $/kg ,July 19 2013) a Moon's volume worth of gold would be at around [math]5.494\cdot 10^{26} dollars[/math] That's about 20 powers of ten more of the richest country's GDP *coughUSAcough*

Even in the case of a Moon-mass gold object, the value is 'only" one power of 10 lower.

Want to compare against the world's monetary output? You are probably more than 25 orders of magnitude inadequate...
 
Now, if we take Apollo 17, and assuming that the lunar samples were made of pure gold, the income would be very far from paying back the mission :

110.4 kg * 1 295 $/kg = 142 968 $
 
Back
Top