Kepler's First Found Planet in Habitable Zone of Sun-like Star

orb

New member
News Reporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
14,020
Reaction score
4
Points
0
NASA JPL / NASA:
NASA's Kepler Mission Confirms Its First Planet in Habitable Zone of Sun-like Star

December 05, 2011

NASA's Kepler mission has confirmed its first planet in the "habitable zone," the region where liquid water could exist on a planet’s surface. Kepler also has discovered more than 1,000 new planet candidates, nearly doubling its previously known count. Ten of these candidates are near-Earth-size and orbit in the habitable zone of their host star. Candidates require follow-up observations to verify they are actual planets.

The newly confirmed planet, Kepler-22b, is the smallest yet found to orbit in the middle of the habitable zone of a star similar to our sun. The planet is about 2.4 times the radius of Earth. Scientists don't yet know if Kepler-22b has a predominantly rocky, gaseous or liquid composition, but its discovery is a step closer to finding Earth-like planets.

Previous research hinted at the existence of near-Earth-size planets in habitable zones, but clear confirmation proved elusive. Two other small planets orbiting stars smaller and cooler than our sun recently were confirmed on the very edges of the habitable zone, with orbits more closely resembling those of Venus and Mars.

{colsp=2}
Click on images for details​
| This artist's conception illustrates Kepler-22b, a planet known to comfortably circle in the habitable zone of a sun-like star.
Image credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech​
| This diagram compares our own solar system to Kepler-22, a star system containing the first "habitable zone" planet discovered by NASA's Kepler mission.
Image credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech​


"This is a major milestone on the road to finding Earth's twin," said Douglas Hudgins, Kepler program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "Kepler's results continue to demonstrate the importance of NASA's science missions, which aim to answer some of the biggest questions about our place in the universe."

Kepler discovers planets and planet candidates by measuring dips in the brightness of more than 150,000 stars to search for planets that cross in front, or "transit," the stars. Kepler requires at least three transits to verify a signal as a planet.

"Fortune smiled upon us with the detection of this planet," said William Borucki, Kepler principal investigator at NASA Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., who led the team that discovered Kepler-22b. "The first transit was captured just three days after we declared the spacecraft operationally ready. We witnessed the defining third transit over the 2010 holiday season."

The Kepler science team uses ground-based telescopes and the Spitzer Space Telescope to review observations on planet candidates the spacecraft finds. The star field that Kepler observes in the constellations Cygnus and Lyra can only be seen from ground-based observatories in spring through early fall. The data from these other observations help determine which candidates can be validated as planets.

Kepler-22b is located 600 light-years away. While the planet is larger than Earth, its orbit of 290 days around a sun-like star resembles that of our world. The planet's host star belongs to the same class as our sun, called G-type, although it is slightly smaller and cooler.

Of the 54 habitable zone planet candidates reported in February 2011, Kepler-22b is the first to be confirmed. This milestone will be published in The Astrophysical Journal.

The Kepler team is hosting its inaugural science conference at Ames Dec. 5-9, announcing 1,094 new planet candidate discoveries. Since the last catalog was released in February, the number of planet candidates identified by Kepler has increased by 89 percent and now totals 2,326. Of these, 207 are approximately Earth-size, 680 are super Earth-size, 1,181 are Neptune-size, 203 are Jupiter-size and 55 are larger than Jupiter.

The findings, based on observations conducted May 2009 to September 2010, show a dramatic increase in the numbers of smaller-size planet candidates.

Kepler observed many large planets in small orbits early in its mission, which were reflected in the February data release. Having had more time to observe three transits of planets with longer orbital periods, the new data suggest that planets one to four times the size of Earth may be abundant in the galaxy.

The number of Earth-size and super Earth-size candidates has increased by more than 200 and 140 percent since February, respectively.

There are 48 planet candidates in their star's habitable zone. While this is a decrease from the 54 reported in February, the Kepler team has applied a stricter definition of what constitutes a habitable zone in the new catalog, to account for the warming effect of atmospheres, which would move the zone away from the star, out to longer orbital periods.

"The tremendous growth in the number of Earth-size candidates tells us that we're honing in on the planets Kepler was designed to detect: those that are not only Earth-size, but also are potentially habitable," said Natalie Batalha, Kepler deputy science team lead at San Jose State University in San Jose, Calif. "The more data we collect, the keener our eye for finding the smallest planets out at longer orbital periods."

{...}



NASA:
NASA Kepler: Kepler-22b, Super-Earth in the habitable zone of a Sun-like Star


SPACE.com: NASA Telescope Confirms Alien Planet in Habitable Zone


Astronomy Now: Kepler finds planet in the habitable zone


Discovery News: Alien Planet Could Host Life


Universe Today: Kepler Confirms First Planet in Habitable Zone of Sun-Like Star


NewScientist: Smallest habitable world around sun-like star found


CBS News Space: Earth-like planet in habitable zone found in Kepler data


RIA Novosti: NASA announces discovery of first earthlike planet in habitable zone


Parabolic Arc: Kepler Confirms First Planet in Habitable Zone Outside Solar System


Aviation Week: Kepler Finds A Goldilocks Zone Planet
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
Just to clear up something here...

The detection method involves a planet orbiting between its host star and the Kepler satellite. As it does so, the light from the star dims a bit. From that, it's possible to determine the size of the planet.

I'f we're looking for planets in the habitable zones of Sun like stars, then we're looking at stars of similar mass and luminosity as our Sun. A planet in the habitable zone of that star would then take approximately 1 year to orbit the star.

When Kepler detects a dip in the star's brightness and if that dip has a specific shape, then we're looking at a candidate for a planet, but we now have to wait about a year, to confirm the detection and measure the orbital period. If the planet then passes in front of the star again after another orbital period, we can be quite sure we've found a planet.

Back in February or around then, NASA released data on new planet *candidates*. Those included five planets that are Earth sized, inside of the star's habitable zone. Turns out, we now have a confirmation of some :)
 

Scruce

Ad astra per aspera
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
1,410
Reaction score
0
Points
0
The Guardian - Exoplanet Kepler 22-b offers best hope yet for a new Earth

Kepler-22-b-008.jpg

An artist's impression of the exoplanet Kepler 22-b which Nasa say is the most Earth-like yet discovered.
Photograph: AFP/Getty Images.
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
Distressing news. The Great Filter is slowly creeping forward from our ancient past, into the future.
 

T.Neo

SA 2010 Soccermaniac
Addon Developer
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
6,368
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Distressing news. The Great Filter is slowly creeping forward from our ancient past, into the future.

I will not waste time distressing over something as silly as the Great Filter.

(Also: are you really that shocked/alarmed/disturbed by the discovery of a super-Earth in the habitable zone of another star? The discovery was bound to happen sometime, there are no physical laws preventing such a phenomenon.)
 

Cras

Spring of Life!
Donator
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
2,215
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.youtube.com
(Also: are you really that shocked/alarmed/disturbed by the discovery of a super-Earth in the habitable zone of another star? The discovery was bound to happen sometime, there are no physical laws preventing such a phenomenon.)

Huh? I have yet to see anyone shocked, alarmed, or disturbed by this news. People are excited that we are now very very close to confirming the existance of an Earth sized planet, in the habitable zone of a Sun like star. Who wouldn't be excited about that?

Nor would I call a planet orbiting a star to be a phenomenon.
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
Why is that?

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter[/ame]

Given cosmological time-scales, any single intelligent species that tried to colonise the entire galaxy would have done it in a negligibly small amount of time (maybe tens of millions of years, if they went really slow). There's a reason we don't see ET life everywhere we look. That reason might be due to life arising very rarely, life almost never evolving to intelligence, or life almost always being destroyed before expanding throughout the galaxy. If the first two possibilities are disproved (by discovering life exists/existed either in our own solar system or the stellar neighbourhood), it gives that much more credibility to the third - we're all gonna die, with a trivially near-1 probability. And that's why life having existed, or even conditions for life having existed, would be Very Bad news.
 
Last edited:

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
But only we have seen about this world thus far are two barely noticeable dips on its star luminosity graph. We don't know anything about what is it like on that planet. Maybe it is actually urbanized like Coruscant when zoomed in (and we aren't noticing a "Natural Reserve, keep away" sign on our Solar System)?
 
Last edited:

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
But only we have seen about this world thus far are two barely noticeable dips on its star luminosity graph. We don't know anything about what is it like on that planet.

Every piece of evidence tips the scales, no matter how negligibly. And lately, the evidence has been piling up in favour of planets being far more abundant than we've previously thought. That pretty much eliminates lack of proper environment as the great filter, which, in our case, restricts it to somewhere between the formation of Earth and an indeterminate event in the future. Discovering ET life would move the earlier boundary from the formation of Earth up to the life of equivalent complexity to what we found. Assuming a Gaussian distribution, even discovering a bacterium would pretty much mean we're dead.
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
I mean the whole theory is built on unproven assumptions. For instance, that life can exist only on terrestrial planets, that we can distinguish activity of a higher intelligence from natural phenomena.
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
I mean the whole theory is built on unproven assumptions. For instance, that life can exist only on terrestrial planets, that we can distinguish activity of a higher intelligence from natural phenomena.

Both of those assumptions are accounted for as Bayesian priors with non-trivial probability.
 
Last edited:

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
As you've pointed out, there are far too many unknowns to be that specific. My only claim is that extra-terrestrial life existing or having existed significantly lowers our chances of long-term survival.
 
Top