Why? Because only freshman dorms are closed during spring break, and only the freshman dorms. I don't know why.
edit: good news, a resident assistant was able to help me move my desktop PC to a different dorm for the week.
Last edited:
I know that (I even put that in the RCV description, that it could hold three people with some light cargo), but now I feel like those windows are being wasted.The extra seats could be removed to hold pressurized cargo, like the crewed CST-100 will.
Something I just realized; how will Mirai perform propulsive maneuvers? It has no Zvezda-analog module on it, at least from what the current renders show...
Or will the space tug you're working on do this?
Well, I am talking about 3-month-long expeditions, with a RCV crew rotation in-between each expedition.
I know that (I even put that in the RCV description, that it could hold three people with some light cargo), but now I feel like those windows are being wasted.
Not sure about that. If you're talking about counteracting long-term orbital decay (which is not simulated in Orbiter), then the UTV (Unmanned Transfer Vehicle, HASDA's version of the HTV - I don't want to call it MTV) would do that.
boogabooga; said:On what timescale are you talking about? Over the course of one orbit, it is usual to see apogee and perigee "increasing" and "decreasing"- this is an effect of non-spherical gravity. Actually, it is the reading on Orbit MFD that increases and decreases because it calculates your ideal orbit at every instant- your actual orbit will be fairly stable, but not quite what Orbit MFD predicts.
Atmospheric drag is calculated to an altitude of about 2000 km. However, as mentioned, it is disabled at high time acceleration-for good reason. Never forget that Orbiter is a numerical simulation and susceptible to "non-physical" results if the time-step is too high. In other words, you don't want to mess with it.
If you want to see atmospheric drag in action, put the simulation on about 1000x acceleration and wait about 2 real-world hours.