Woe, far out, man!
On March 23, 2009, NASA announced that the overall vote winner was "Colbert", with 230,539 votes. Nearly 1.2 million votes were cast in total. "Serenity" was the top choice among the NASA-provided names, with 70% of the vote, but finished second overall, losing to "Colbert" by more than 40,000 votes. The naming contest rules, however, state that although the poll results will be taken into account, NASA has ultimate discretion in choosing an appropriate name for the node. United States congressman Chaka Fattah believes that paying attention to democracy and voting results shouldn't be limited to earthbound organizations so he plans to use congressional power to force NASA to honor the winning "Colbert" write in votes. On April 6, 2009, Stephen Colbert threatened a lawsuit if the node is not named after him.
Woe, far out, man!
The station's new load bearing treadmill was named "'Combined Operational Load Bearing External Resistance Treadmill" or "COLBERT".
![]()
Now that is something we can be proud of....right?!?! Geezzz... Now NASA has been commercialized. Is there anything left that hasn't been made into a mockery?!
Orbiter?Now that is something we can be proud of....right?!?! Geezzz... Now NASA has been commercialized. Is there anything left that hasn't been made into a mockery?!
There was no commercialization. NASA was not paid for this.Now that is something we can be proud of....right?!?! Geezzz... Now NASA has been commercialized. Is there anything left that hasn't been made into a mockery?!
Congratulations, you have just realized that something happened since Skylab. :lol:
There was no commercialization. NASA was not paid for this.
NASA did not receive money from Colbert for him to put his name on something.Errr.....yea..right, they weren't paid.