One is suborbital tourism, the other is orbital payload delivery. Apples and oranges.
The sub-orbital tourism is just a stepping stone. An orbital version of the New Shepard is on the drawing boards and will be launched from CCAFS/KSC. Blue Origin has acquired a large land area on KSC property that will be home to the factory that will manufacture the launch vehicle as well a several test stands.One is suborbital tourism, the other is orbital payload delivery. Apples and oranges.
One is suborbital tourism, the other is orbital payload delivery. Apples and oranges.
The sub-orbital tourism is just a stepping stone. An orbital version of the New Shepard is on the drawing boards and will be launched from CCAFS/KSC. Blue Origin has acquired a large land area on KSC property that will be home to the factory that will manufacture the launch vehicle as well a several test stands.
Here's the announcement video:
Blue Origin To Launch from Cape Canaveral - YouTube
That's great, but Blue Origin isn't even close yet. Still a huge difference in velocities, altitudes, energy, and safety concerns.
At this point, it's like comparing the X-15 to the X-20 DynaSoar or the Space Shuttle.
I'm not "betting" on SpaceX, or taking sides. I'm just pointing out that they are in two different flight regimes, and two different business models.
Jeff Bezos is really competing more with Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic than he is with Musk. And given the setbacks and delays with SpaceShipTwo, including two fatal accidents and no actual spaceflights to date, Blue Origin seems to have a good lead on the competition.
No, I don't speak/read Latin, so ignored it... but I see it means very much the same thing.Did you understand the Latin quote? (The German and English translations also exist, but both are based on the same Latin)
SpaceX has a massive lead. They might be a year away from flying their first reused core to orbit.
I'd say they even, but coming from opposite directions, but I'll give the edge to BO as they've reused their stages.. SpaceX still has to learn (do) that.SpaceX has a massive lead. They might be a year away from flying their first reused core to orbit.
Oh and... yea, SpaceX is in orbit. BO isn't even near yet.
BO landing vertically in the same area they took off from is easy in comparison to landing on a ship in the middle of the ocean
I'd say they even, but coming from opposite directions, but I'll give the edge to BO as they've reused their stages.. SpaceX still has to learn (do) that.
Both land vertically.. and on the X (where ever X is).. so there's no advantage there.
BO doesn't go orbital. You're comparing a bike with training wheels to a Ferrari F1 car.
And landing on solid ground is easier, seeing as how solid ground doesn't usually move - and is larger...
You know what they say about the weather. Everyone talks about it, but no one does anything about it.
Right, not much to talk about, in an ice age.
Jezz Bezos said:Watch the fourth flight of the same New Shepard hardware this Sunday. Liftoff is planned for approximately 10:15 am ET and the live webcast starts half an hour earlier at 9:45 am ET at www.blueorigin.com.
On this flight, we’ll intentionally fail one string of parachutes on the capsule. There are three strings of chutes and two of the three should still deploy nominally and, along with our retrothrust system, safely land the capsule. Works on paper, and this test is designed to validate that. We’ll also use this flight to continue pushing the envelope on the booster.
As always, this is a development test flight and anything can happen.
Watching a rocket launch (and rocket landing!) might add a little extra fun with the kids on Father’s Day -- enjoy.
Gradatim Ferociter!
Jeff Bezos