Project CST-100

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Looks like I'll have to work on the VC some more..

Have you a .msh version of it, even if not finished ? I think it would help to make the capsule less erm transparent :)

Another temporary option I can do is to put a matte black cone inside, its a way to do it...
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Have you a .msh version of it, even if not finished ? I think it would help to make the capsule less erm transparent :)

Another temporary option I can do is to put a matte black cone inside, its a way to do it...

Better use two inside meshes: One coarse for looking from outside, and a detailled one for VC mode.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Better use two inside meshes: One coarse for looking from outside, and a detailled one for VC mode.

Yes, that would be the ideal option in terms of FPS-saving. Well ky, do what you can with the time you have ;)
 

ky

Director of Manned Spaceflight
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Boynton Beach
Have you a .msh version of it, even if not finished ? I think it would help to make the capsule less erm transparent :)

Another temporary option I can do is to put a matte black cone inside, its a way to do it...

I think I posted a link a few pages back, but let me check to see if I uploaded it to mediafire
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
I think that the version you posted is the sketchpad one (.skp) ;)
 

francisdrake

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
977
Points
128
Website
francisdrakex.deviantart.com
An abort thrust of 4 x 258 kN fits quite well. For a spacecraft mass of 12 ton this gives an inital acceleration of 79 m/s², which is fairly cloase to the 72 m/s² of the (planned) Dragon LAS.

I'd guess that the LAS-thrusters would not be used during orbital maneuvers, only the separate forward pushig orbital thrusters, located in the doghouses. The LAS thrusters could be discarded after the launch phase, but I guess making the high pressure feed system and engine supports severable would make the system unnecessary complicated.
 

MaverickSawyer

Acolyte of the Probe
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
5
Points
61
Location
Wichita
Could they be used for deorbit manuevers? After all, if you're not going to abort, might as well use the propellants somehow. Maybe only two Bantams light off...
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
An abort thrust of 4 x 258 kN fits quite well.

From what said above, we can safely add the 134 kN of the OMAC thrusters. Adds a good 10% of thrust.

Wouldn't it be somewhat uneven?

Given the shape of the thrusters and their orientation, I'm about sure they can be gimbaled to control the spacecraft during the abort.

Could they be used for deorbit manuevers? After all, if you're not going to abort, might as well use the propellants somehow.

We concluded above that all the SM thrusters share the same propellants, which indeed makes much more sense, before that I wasn't understanding the point of such a system. ;) So once in orbit, only the thrusters themselves are dead mass, and they probably aren't very heavy.
 
Last edited:

francisdrake

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
977
Points
128
Website
francisdrakex.deviantart.com
Wouldn't it be somewhat uneven?

To reduce problems with uneven firing of the abort engines, they are angled outwards, so each thrust vector points approximately through the spacecrafts mass center.

In case one engine does not light up (or underperforms) the resulting force vector will push the spacecraft somewhat sideways, but will not lead to an uncontrolled rotation.

By angling out the nozzles some forward thrust is lost, but this is minor.
For 20° angle the loss is 1-cos(20°) = 6%.
About 200 m/s are needed for an abort, while we estimate the service module to have 400 - 500 m/s in its tanks.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
The tanks will likely have enough for an orbital mission on board, which is closer to 300 m/s. Which is still enough for an abort.

Also, it looks like the engines can be gimballed - at least some details on the renderings look like there are gimbal actuators installed.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Some texturing and meshing work on the Centaur nozzles again :

N2EJCV0.jpg


Still not perfect, but closer from reality.

Edit : I have to learn how those environnement maps work. They could make that chrome-engine-plumbing look really cool. It's almost impossible to have something that looks like chrome without reflexion.

---------- Post added 04-30-13 at 02:01 AM ---------- Previous post was 04-29-13 at 04:37 PM ----------

OK now this is getting interesting. I've put too much of it to see how it works, of course, but it looks soo nice ! Perfect for the engine plumbing.

jcGWZX9.jpg


Y8TXiwY.jpg


I don't even understand how it can work so well without major framerate impact. Hail Jarmonik !! :hail:

---------- Post added at 12:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:01 AM ----------

Yes, I think I begin to like it that way, still lacks some detail but we're getting there :

we9NffZ.jpg


A decent preview of the Centaur/CST-100 combo :

K7HMldu.jpg
 
Last edited:

PhantomCruiser

Wanderer
Moderator
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,607
Reaction score
170
Points
153
Location
Cleveland
That 3rd one has to go in the manual, awesome job and great screenshot!
 

ky

Director of Manned Spaceflight
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Boynton Beach
Boeing has nothing on us (Except money, resources, etc) :)
 
Last edited:

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Well, the engine plumbing would likely be a nightmare, the RL-10 is not really simple. But then, you could at least make the combustion chamber the proper size and place the pumps in the proper shape and orientation :D

RL-10_with_cutaway.JPG

An_RL-10_engine_at_LSM.jpg


I think the important detail of the engines are the two U-shaped sections of the plumbing.
 
Last edited:

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Well, I'd say that the engine model itself is hardly 50% complete, a lot of the plumbing is missing. The size of the combustion chamber is ok*, as I've used a schematic to get the proportions. One engine is mounted in the wrong direction, yes. The problem about that is that the 2-engines version flew only one time (1998 or so), and even then it wasn't on the Atlas V. So it's very hard to find good pics of the layout, and pics of the engine alone don't help for that (in fact it's like "hmm, where that end should be plugged where ?").

705px-Centaur_rocket_stage.jpg


See what I mean ? :shifty:

Then there is also all the wiring at the back of the Centaur, which is a real maze of cables, relays and boxes. Currently only the RCS system plumbing is modeled.

Also I'll have to make the SE version, and also the optional mission duration expansion packs (more He tanks for more restarts, more RCS for the additional ullage burns, heavier but more durable batteries). Maybe also different variations of insulation which would have an influence on the empty mass and the boiloff rates. I already found info from L-M about that.

There's a lot of work on that second stage. :coffee: Ideally, it will work as a "stand alone", so you'll be able to use it with other rockets, or in a shuttle bay...

*On the above pics, the engines have not the extensible nozzle feature, or it has been removed, so the proportions look different.
 
Last edited:

Kyle

Armchair Astronaut
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
3,912
Reaction score
340
Points
123
Website
orbithangar.com
That pluming does look hard to model. I really wish I was better at mesh making, otherwise I would help out with that to save time.
 
Last edited:

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
If you want to help, you can also search for good pics of centaur stages, single or dual engine. It is quite time-consuming for me to search for that. :tiphat:

Of course some people do it the easy way and hide everything interesting behind a fictional casing (also notice the wrong shape of the nozzle) :

167832main_lcross_profile_hires.jpg
 
Last edited:

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
I think the fine plumbing could be replaced by semitransparent textures, not really necessary to do. But of course: The violet and the red stuff in the centaur photo is removed before installation (violet) and before flight (red).
 
Top