OHM ENERGY project, release 4

PhantomCruiser

Wanderer
Moderator
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,607
Reaction score
169
Points
153
Location
Cleveland
I can't get the hud working :( Is it broken in 2010P1?

*edit: Nevermind, I think it's related to the use of the dx9 client. Because in default client I can see the HUD.


I think clicking the [GDI compatability mode] button in the [Video] tab will allow the HUD to work in the DX9 client.
 

8bitgamer13

New member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
116
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Why does orbiter CTD when I remove a booster, and is it possible to fly the Energia without boosters/with a custom configuration?
EDIT:
"---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WARNING: Obsolete API function used: oapiGetStationCount
At least one active module is accessing an obsolete interface function.
Addons which rely on obsolete functions may not be compatible with
future versions of Orbiter.
---------------------------------------------------------------"
I removed a booster with the scenario editor, waited for the imminent CTD, checked the orbiter log and found this at the end. Anything I can do to remedy this?
 
Last edited:

PhantomCruiser

Wanderer
Moderator
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,607
Reaction score
169
Points
153
Location
Cleveland
Why would you want to fly Energia without boosters?

IRL there would be various cheaper vehicles to choose from.
 

Sunhillow

Donator
Donator
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
703
Reaction score
707
Points
93
Location
Göppingen
And I think the core block alone would not lift off with full tanks like Ariane 5 core
 

8bitgamer13

New member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
116
Reaction score
1
Points
0
No, I used the scenario that had the default DG attached. I tried installing it on Orbiter 2006 (I kept it for project mercury) and got very similar results.
Also, apologies for asking an on-the-side question, but do you know if I'm in violation of OF's rules if I create a new account for the purpose of using another name? I chose this one some time ago, <i>and I simply cannot stand it anymore</i>.
 
Top