Question General Spaceflight Q&A

Mantis

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Mississauga, Ontario
I noticed something for the first time after watching Endeavour land at the conclusion of STS-134. There appeared to be some sort of flame/hot exhaust gas radiating from the aft fusilage in the area near where the tail fin meets the OMS pods. I am guessing that it's exhaust venting from the APUs but it was the first time that I'd ever actually seen flame there - granted any flame would not likely be visible in daylight but I can't recall ever seeing that before on a night landing either. Am I correct that it was related to the APUs?

You can see it quite clearly in the image on the page below:

http://www.space.com/11839-space-shuttle-endeavour-sts134-final-landing.html
 
Last edited:

garyw

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
10,485
Reaction score
209
Points
138
Location
Kent
Website
blog.gdwnet.com
Yes, it's the APU exhaust. It's normally invisible but with night landings you can see it. It also really shows up on the Infra red!!
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,588
Reaction score
2,312
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Yes, that is the APU exhaust.
 

Mantis

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Mississauga, Ontario
Yes, it's the APU exhaust. It's normally invisible but with night landings you can see it. It also really shows up on the Infra red!!

I'll say! When I saw that infrared footage, my first throught was that there was a fire back there. I seem to recall that they did indeed once have a fire back there on Columbia.

Edit: It was STS-9, the Spacelab One mission flown by Columbia. Two of the three APUs caught fire just before landing. It was caused by a hydrazine leak.
 
Last edited:

Wishbone

Clueless developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
2,421
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Moscow
It is 3 days (at least) and no updates at NASA on ISS Daily reports. Is it a sign of vacation season for PA folks?
 

DanM

Поехали!
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
1
Points
38
Location
Chicago
What did the astronauts wear under their ACES? It looks like blue Underarmor.
 

IronRain

The One and Only (AFAIK)
Administrator
Moderator
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
3,484
Reaction score
403
Points
123
Location
Utrecht
Website
www.spaceflightnewsapi.net
How is the attitude controlled of the station? And I don't mean like hardware but actually who controls it. The astronauts/cosmonauts aboard the station or ground controllers?
 

Wishbone

Clueless developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
2,421
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Moscow
Commands can be issued from onboard the station, and from both MCCs. AFAIR early on (before CMGs were installed) attitude control could be transferred to the Shuttle if docked.
 

diogom

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
413
Points
98
Just wondering, how "fast" is the internet connection in the ISS?
 

ky

Director of Manned Spaceflight
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Boynton Beach
Just wondering, how "fast" is the internet connection in the ISS?

Internet browsing is done through a Citrix Remote Desktop connection to a computer at JSC in Houston, it's not that easy to quantify exactly how fast it'd be if you were up there.

The internet access is provided through the Crew Support LAN on the ISS - this is connected to the ground using the Ku-band service on NASA's Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System. This is capable of 25 megabits upstream (to space) and 300 megabits downstream bandwidth, although the service is shared with other NASA and Department of Defense spacecraft.

Because the TDRSS satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, the round-trip time to and from the ISS is about 500ms

Also,how long could the ISS stay in orbit without a crew?
 

tblaxland

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Addon Developer
Webmaster
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
7,320
Reaction score
25
Points
113
Location
Sydney, Australia
Also,how long could the ISS stay in orbit without a crew?
It depends on:
  1. How much warning they have to prepare the vehicle before de-crewing; and
  2. What consumables are on board; and
  3. The nature of the condition that required de-crewing and associated repairs/spares that may be required.
There are no hard answers but there is some interesting reading on the topic here: http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=22471
 

Eagle1Division

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Opening Payload Bay Doors?...

I remember reading somewhere that the shuttle doesn't open it's bay doors soon after MECO, that it waits a good while first. I know it's vague, but if it's true, why? Wouldn't opening the payload bay doors be one of the first things done on-orbit, to get rid of the system heat of the hydraulics, EPS, APU, OMS and MPS from the climb to orbit and OMS burns?

...Maybe, is it because they want to ensure all systems are working before they open the doors?

Shuttle Reference Manual didn't even mention the opening of the Payload bay doors as one of the post-MECO ops.
 

Turbo

New member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Pretty sure they open the doors after OMS-2. MECO is a good 30 minutes before OMS-2

I could be wrong but thats how I thought it was.

Edit: This is from the Nasa Space flight website for STS-135


“Main Engine Cutoff (MECO) occurred at 189/15:37:28 GMT (00/00:08:24 MET). The External Tank (ET) separated from the Orbiter at 189/15:37:49 GMT (00/00:08:45 MET). A nominal OMS-2 maneuver was performed at 189/16:06:49.1 GMT (00/00:37:45 MET). The maneuver was 64.8 sec in duration,” added the MER report.
“The payload bay doors were opened at 189/17:03:20 GMT (00/01:34:16 MET). The Ku-Band antenna was deployed and the self-test was completed with satisfactory results.”
 
Last edited:

Eagle1Division

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Errr are you talking about SSU or real Space Shuttles? :blink:

Definitely the Real space shuttle...

Pretty sure they open the doors after OMS-2. MECO is a good 30 minutes before OMS-2

I could be wrong but thats how I thought it was.

Edit: This is from the Nasa Space flight website for STS-135


“Main Engine Cutoff (MECO) occurred at 189/15:37:28 GMT (00/00:08:24 MET). The External Tank (ET) separated from the Orbiter at 189/15:37:49 GMT (00/00:08:45 MET). A nominal OMS-2 maneuver was performed at 189/16:06:49.1 GMT (00/00:37:45 MET). The maneuver was 64.8 sec in duration,” added the MER report.
“The payload bay doors were opened at 189/17:03:20 GMT (00/01:34:16 MET). The Ku-Band antenna was deployed and the self-test was completed with satisfactory results.”

Okay, thanks so I know what I heard was right. I remember it was from a somewhat reliable source.

About 3 minutes less than a full hour after the OMS-2 burn! So what's the delay for? Seems like opening the doors would be one of the first priorities: to get the radiators working :blink:
 

agentgonzo

Grounded since '09
Addon Developer
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Location
Hampshire, UK
Website
orbiter.quorg.org
Definitely the Real space shuttle...



Okay, thanks so I know what I heard was right. I remember it was from a somewhat reliable source.

About 3 minutes less than a full hour after the OMS-2 burn! So what's the delay for? Seems like opening the doors would be one of the first priorities: to get the radiators working :blink:
I'm just guessing here but checklists in spaceflight aren't exactly short. They'll need to verify that the OMS-2 burn was done successfully and get confirmation from the ground that their orbit has sufficiently changed such that they are in an orbital trajectory. The last thing that you want to do is open your PLB doors and then find that you're suborbital and in 45 minutes you'll be hitting the atmosphere again.
 

Wishbone

Clueless developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
2,421
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Moscow
Yup, that's for the AOA (abort once around) option to be viable. Speaking from memory of generic flight rules.
 

agentgonzo

Grounded since '09
Addon Developer
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Location
Hampshire, UK
Website
orbiter.quorg.org
Yup, that's for the AOA (abort once around) option to be viable. Speaking from memory of generic flight rules.
As an aside, I remember reading that AOA was massively unlikely to ever happen. The difference in velocity between a TAL (Transatlantic abort) and ATO (abort to orbit) which AOA lives in was something like half a second of main engine thrust.
 

Mantis

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Mississauga, Ontario
As an aside, I remember reading that AOA was massively unlikely to ever happen. The difference in velocity between a TAL (Transatlantic abort) and ATO (abort to orbit) which AOA lives in was something like half a second of main engine thrust.

I would assume though that AOA would be used after successfully achieving orbit if they discovered some dire failure of the orbiter during those post-insertion checklists - a failure of multiple fuel cells or some other potentially catestrophic event that would mandate immediate termination of the flight.
 
Top