SpaceX Successfully Conducts Full Mission-Length Firing of its Falcon 9

tl8

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
3,645
Reaction score
25
Points
88
Location
Gold Coast QLD
Significant Milestone Achieved as SpaceX Prepares to Demonstrate U.S. Transport to the International Space Station
Hawthorne, CA - November 23, 2008
SpaceX successfully conducted a full mission-length firing of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle's first stage at its McGregor Test Facility in Texas, on November 22. For the static test firing, the first stage remains firmly secured to the massive vertical test stand, where it fired for 178 seconds or nearly three minutes – simulating the climb of the giant rocket from the surface of the Earth towards orbit.

At full power, the rocket generated 855,000 pounds of force at sea level. In vacuum, the thrust increases to approximately one million pounds or four times the maximum thrust of a 747 aircraft. The test consumed over half a million pounds of propellant. All nine engines fired for 160 seconds, then two engines were shut down to limit the acceleration and the remaining seven engines continued firing for 18 more seconds, as would occur in a typical climb to orbit.
The test firing validated the design of SpaceX's use of nine engines on the first stage, as well as the ability to shut down engines without affecting the functioning of the remaining engines. This demonstrates the ability of Falcon 9 to lose engines in flight and still complete its mission successfully, much as a commercial airliner is designed to be safe in the event of an engine loss. Like an airliner, the Falcon 9 engines are enclosed in a protective sheath that ensures a fire or destructive loss of an engine doesn't affect the rest of the vehicle.

The Falcon 9 will be the first vehicle since the Saturn V and Saturn 1 to have the ability to lose any engine/motor and still be able to complete its mission without loss of crew or spacecraft. Engine out reliability proved crucial to mission success on two of the Saturn V flights.

"In the past month, we performed significant upgrades to the test stand and flame trench in preparation for this test," said Tom Mueller, Vice President of Propulsion for SpaceX. "We added the flight base heat shields around the engines to protect the bottom of the rocket from the prolonged blast of heat and vibration."
"The full mission-length test firing clears the highest hurdle for the Falcon 9 first stage before launch," said Elon Musk, CEO and CTO of SpaceX. "In the next few months, we will have the first Falcon 9 flight vehicle on its launch pad at Cape Canaveral, preparing for lift-off in 2009."

About SpaceX
SpaceX is developing a family of launch vehicles intended to increase the reliability and reduce the cost of both manned and unmanned space transportation, ultimately by a factor of ten. With its Falcon line of launch vehicles, powered by internally-developed Merlin engines, SpaceX offers light, medium and heavy lift capabilities to deliver spacecraft into any altitude and inclination, from low-Earth to geosynchronous orbit to planetary missions.
On September 28, 2008, Falcon 1, designed and manufactured from the ground up by SpaceX, became the first privately-developed liquid fuel rocket to achieve Earth orbit.

As a winner of the NASA Commercial Orbital Transportation Services competition (COTS), SpaceX is in a position to help fill the gap in American spaceflight to the International Space Station (ISS) when the Space Shuttle retires in 2010. Under the existing Agreement, SpaceX will conduct three flights of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle and Dragon spacecraft for NASA, culminating in Dragon berthing with the ISS. SpaceX is the only COTS contender with the capability to return cargo to Earth and demonstrate the capability to carry crew to and from the ISS.

Founded in 2002, the SpaceX team now numbers nearly 600, located primarily in Hawthorne, California, with four additional locations: SpaceX's Texas Test Facility in McGregor near Waco; offices in Washington DC; and launch facilities at Cape Canaveral, Florida, and the Marshall Islands in the Central Pacific.

(Click picture to play video)​

Photo/Video Caption: The full mission duration test firing of the Falcon 9 rocket first stage lasted 178 seconds, nearly three minutes. Conducted at the SpaceX test facility in McGregor, Texas, the nine Merlin engines produced 855,000 lbs. of thrust and consumed over half a million pounds of liquid oxygen and rocket grade kerosene during the test.​
 

spcefrk

AeroEng
Donator
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
California
The Falcon 9 will be the first vehicle since the Saturn V and Saturn 1 to have the ability to lose any engine/motor and still be able to complete its mission without loss of crew or spacecraft. Engine out reliability proved crucial to mission success on two of the Saturn V flights.

I call this into question. STS-51F climbed to orbit despite an SSME failure.
 

movieman

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Canada
I call this into question. STS-51F climbed to orbit despite an SSME failure.

Challenger was destroyed due to an SRB failure. So they're correct: the shuttle can't lose 'any engine' and still complete its mission.

Of course the Saturn Ib couldn't either, because if it lost the SIVB's J-2 early on it was the end of the mission; the SM wouldn't have enough fuel and thrust to reach orbit. The Saturn V could still perform some kind of mission if it lost the SIVB, but it would be orbital, not lunar.
 

zerofay32

Buckeye
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
471
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Dayton, Ohio
STS-51-F had an SSME shutdown 5:45 into the flight and resulted in an Abort to Orbit (ATO). Depending on when the engine out occurs, the shuttle can still continue the mission. The Challenger accident was STS-51-L.

Zerofay32
 

movieman

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Canada
STS-51-F had an SSME shutdown 5:45 into the flight and resulted in an Abort to Orbit (ATO). Depending on when the engine out occurs, the shuttle can still continue the mission. The Challenger accident was STS-51-L.

Yes, I'm fully aware of that.

My point was that if the shuttle loses an SRB at any time up to a few seconds before separation, then the shuttle is destroyed and the crew die; it can't lose 'any engine' and survive, let alone complete it's mission.
 

Linguofreak

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
5,032
Reaction score
1,273
Points
188
Location
Dallas, TX
Challenger was destroyed due to an SRB failure. So they're correct: the shuttle can't lose 'any engine' and still complete its mission.

Of course the Saturn Ib couldn't either, because if it lost the SIVB's J-2 early on it was the end of the mission; the SM wouldn't have enough fuel and thrust to reach orbit. The Saturn V could still perform some kind of mission if it lost the SIVB, but it would be orbital, not lunar.

But a loss of the J-2 on the Saturn Ib still would have allowed for a safe launch abort. The loss of an SRB at, say, T+10, on a shuttle mission would be an LOCV.
 

Juanelm

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Too bad the video does not let us get a good sense of scale. That thing must be huge.
 

Zatnikitelman

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
2,302
Reaction score
6
Points
38
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA, North America
WOW Can't wait to see that thing lofting a satellite into a perfectly trimmed LEO!
Diameter is 3.8m with a total length of 54.9m but that's with a second stage and fairing on top.
 

movieman

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Canada
But a loss of the J-2 on the Saturn Ib still would have allowed for a safe launch abort.

An unplanned launch abort isn't a 'completed mission' in anything but the most pedantic sense :).
 

MajorTom

Ker-splash!
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
354
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Puget Sound
I can't wait until the maiden flight of an F9.

Two engines cutoff late in the burn? Interesting! I assume it will be the center engine, then one more...so they'd have an unsymmetrical pattern of engines firing...
 

Linguofreak

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
5,032
Reaction score
1,273
Points
188
Location
Dallas, TX
An unplanned launch abort isn't a 'completed mission' in anything but the most pedantic sense :).

Of course not. I'd still rather do an unplanned abort after a SIVb failure on a Saturn than an unplanned abort after an SRB failure on a shuttle.

The critical thing here is that you can lose thrust in any single engine and not have an LOCV. (Explosive failures are, of course, a different matter, but even then you're more likely to make it in a Saturn than a Shuttle).

The Soviet's two Soyuz launch aborts both involved situations that would have lead to an LOCV with the Shuttle.
 

simonpro

Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
7
Points
0
An unplanned launch abort isn't a 'completed mission' in anything but the most pedantic sense :).

Based on past PR efforts, SpaceX would probably count it as a highly successful mission. ;)
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,614
Reaction score
2,335
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Falcon 9 Heavy will be quite a sight with 27 engines at lift off!!

Soyuz lifts off with 20+12 chambers burning (though these only count as 5 engines, because of the use of central turbopumps)
 
Top