Graham2001
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,516
- Reaction score
- 68
- Points
- 48
Too bad he takes 16mm film and SD video (and lower quality that), digitalized who knows how, crops half of it and/or stretches the image horizontally so it's 16:9, and then upscales to 4K. ??Just stumbled on this YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/JacksonTyler ...
and started with Apollo 16
Which was excellent!
With just 2.07K subscribers, I think it deserves more.
It reminds me of a guy who thought that if he took a 360p video and played it in a big HDTV screen, it would be HD quality...
When I'm doing restorations I don't crop. 4:3 looks really nice on big screens and also fits mobile well (on portrait orientation).Too bad he takes 16mm film and SD video (and lower quality that), digitalized who knows how, crops half of it and/or stretches the image horizontally so it's 16:9, and then upscales to 4K. ??
I don't really care how many algorithms were used or how smart they are, if the data isn't there... then it isn't there.
It reminds me of a guy who thought that if he took a 360p video and played it in a big HDTV screen, it would be HD quality...
/rant
I can't even tell you how many customers are asking us for 4k timelapse publication (vs. HD) because "that looks better on my IPhone". The placebo is real...It reminds me of a guy who thought that if he took a 360p video and played it in a big HDTV screen, it would be HD quality...