Launch News A Wild Russian Monster Rocket has appeared! Angara-A5 test flight, December 23, 2014

C3PO

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
2,605
Reaction score
17
Points
53
That thing just jumped of the pad. Would it beat the STS in a 1/4 mile drag race? :lol:

I thought the 5-core setup looked very kerbal, but I didn't want to jinx it. :thumbup:
 

C3PO

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
2,605
Reaction score
17
Points
53
I think that's because it went severely underloaded this time. It was carrying just a little boilerplate mock-up...

Spaceflightnow reports the mockup sat at ~2.000 kg. Given that it can carry 5.400 kg to GTO, the extra 3.400 kg shouldn't make that much difference during the liftoff. However on a ~25 T mission to LEO the difference might be noticeable.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,278
Reaction score
3,247
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Congratulations Russia ;)

The cloud cover is impressively low. American or European standard would probably not have allowed a launch within those conditions. But again russian launchers are designed to be weather-proof ;-)

The way the engines cast light on it before the launcher even lifts off is incredible. Quite a strong light source BTW.

When you think to it, it's a big R-7. 1+4 LOX/RP-1 liquid boosters, definitively a proven configuration :yes:.

Long life to the (already big) new-born ! :lol:
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
Few launch pictures are published at the Ministry of Defence website:

http://xn--80ahclcogc6ci4h.xn--90anlfbebar6i.xn--p1ai/multimedia/photo/gallery.htm?id=19747@cmsPhotoGallery

DSC_0101.jpg


DSC_1270.jpg


DSC_1274.jpg


DSC_0239.jpg


DSC_9891.jpg


DSC_9899.jpg


DSC_9924.jpg


DSC_1278%281%29.jpg


DSC_0244.jpg


DSC_1285.jpg


DSC_0246.jpg


And TASS news agency have just reported the successful GEO insertion for the Briz-M with the dummy payload! :cheers:
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
Also:

After demonstrating its GEO ascent mission taking exactly nine hours, the Briz-M will perform two disposal maneuvers - one about 11 hours and the next about 12.5 hours into the flight, targeting a graveyard orbit above the Geostationary Belt to avoid adding to the space debris problem. The payload simulator will remain attached to the Briz-M
 

n122vu

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
3,196
Reaction score
51
Points
73
Location
KDCY
Or D&D with the random monster thing.

But heck yeah! Angara is long overdue, good to see it fly.

I was thinking Dragon Warrior.
Dragon_Warrior_%2528NES%2529_11.gif


Either way, congrats Russia for a successful launch!
 

Astro SG Wise

Future Orion MPCV Pilot
Joined
May 26, 2014
Messages
489
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Website
www.aesd.blogspot.com
So, were there Angaras 1-4 before? I am only familliar with Soyuz and Proton-K, but I saw [ame="http://orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=5965"]this add on[/ame].
 

PhantomCruiser

Wanderer
Moderator
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
167
Points
153
Location
Cleveland
There was an Angara (core only, no boosters) launch earlier this year. And yeah that's a really cool add-on, couple it up with [ame="http://orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=6294"]PTK NP Spacecraft[/ame] and it's pretty awesome.
 

orbitingpluto

Orbiteer
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
618
Reaction score
0
Points
16
So, were there Angaras 1-4 before? I am only familliar with Soyuz and Proton-K, but I saw this add on.

The whole number refers to the number of cores, for example the Angara 5 has 4 cores around the central one, the Angara 3 has two cores around the central one, and the Angara 1 has it's center core ride alone. Even with the decimal numbers(Angara 1.1 and 1.2) it's still pretty simple.
 
Top