Launch News (Bad orbit!) Arianespace Soyuz-STB flight VS09 with Galileo FOC-1/2, August 22, 2014

boogabooga

Bug Crusher
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Oops!



US reports put the satellites in a 13700 x 25900 x 50 degree orbit, a bit off from the 23000 km, 55 degree circular orbit planned. Probably still within the satellites own capability to correct though.... :rolleyes:

So instead of a circular orbit, we end up with an elliptical orbit in the wrong plane.

Wonder if Fregat got the pitch/yaw angles switched... :hmm:


Edit oops, sorry, didn't see this:
Someone has made the calculations that a correct burn duration of the Fregat in its 2nd burn mis-pointing 145 degrees out of the V-bar (where it should have been pointed at) would result in the current orbit.

Sounds like some programmer at Lavochkin is about to be fired....
duck.gif
 
Last edited:

orbitingpluto

Orbiteer
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
618
Reaction score
0
Points
16
From a Space News article:

As of midafternoon Central European Time Aug. 23 — 24 hours after launch and 20 hours after the Fregat stage inserted the satellites into orbit — launch service provider Arianespace and the European Space Agency said they were still investigating the injection anomaly and could not conclude what, if any, effect it would have on the two satellites’ functionality.

............

Climbing into correct position from a too-low perigee requires the use of fuel that would otherwise be used over the satellite’s life for regular maneuvers, but does not by itself mean the loss of the mission.


The inclination error, however, appears too serious to allow much, if any, use of the satellites, according to officials. Correcting the error likely would require more propellant than the satellites carry and, even if they did reach the correct position, they would arrive with propellant levels so low that the effort would be deemed useless.

Working it out seems unlikely at this point.
 

jedidia

shoemaker without legs
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
10,910
Reaction score
2,168
Points
203
Location
between the planets
Do I get this right, Arianespace subcontracted the launch to Roscosmos?
 

Cosmic Penguin

Geek Penguin in GTO
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
2
Points
63
Location
Hong Kong
Well.... :rolleyes:

The Moscow-based investigation commission into the Galileo launch accident was expected to convene for the first time on Monday (August 24). As of August 24, all publicly available data from the flight pointed toward a wrong orientation of the Fregat upper stage during its second engine firing, which led to the However whether it was caused by the faulty attitude control system, or by its software or by some failure during the flight remains a mystery. Peculiarly, the telemetry from the flight control system on the Fregat apparently indicated flawless performance of all systems.

By August 25, several reliable posters on the Novosti Kosmonavtiki web forum indicated that the attention had quickly focused on two out of 12 small thrusters that are used to keep the Fregat upper stage in right orientation during unpowered flight and also place it in correct attitude for the firing of the main engine. It seems that the firing of two thrusters was interrupted, even though they had received all the correct commands from the flight control system. As a result, the Fregat started its second main engine firing in the wrong direction, causing the change in the orbital inclination toward the Equator, instead of boosting its altitude.

It is still unclear the role of the flight control system in failing to detect or report this problem to ground control.

The Fregat is equipped with 12 thrusters fed from a common hydrazine fuel distribution line. Four such thrusters are used to control the roll of the stage during the powered phase of the flight (when the main engine fires).

Not good considering that the Fregat design comes from the propulsion units for interplanetary spacecraft, which demands high pointing reliability! :facepalm:
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Flawless performance of all systems would also mean: It can tell where the target is(guidance), knows where it is going (Navigation) and goes where it wants to go (Control).

Doesn't sound that flawless. Possible could be of course, that the stage did exactly what was programmed into it on the ground - and executed a wrong manoeuvre.
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
This seems very weird to me... The thrusters received the correct commands to fire, but after the fact, there was no check done to see where the spacecraft is pointed towards?

If the software was written like that, then someone DEFINITELY needs to get fired.
 

Cosmic Penguin

Geek Penguin in GTO
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
2
Points
63
Location
Hong Kong
Ouch..... :facepalm:

Complex failure scenario emerges

By August 28, specialists familiar with the operation of the Fregat upper stage and with basic details of the investigation had been able to discern a rough sequence of events that had likely led to the failure of the Soyuz mission with Galileo satellites last week. As it turned out, the so-called barbecue mode (a rotation of the Fregat stage to even out heating of the satellites by the Sun) is always preceded by a special "re-orientation" maneuver. It is designed to prevent sensitive mechanical gyroscopes onboard the stage from stalling. Such a re-orientation is conducted individually for each of three axises with a certain angular speed and over a certain time period.

It appears that during the delivery of Galileo satellites on August 22, at the very end of the re-orientation routine, the flight control system detected a wrong angular speed and sent commands to Fregat's thrusters to correct the situation. For a yet unknown reason, engines failed to achieve that, even though available telemetry confirms that electric valves activated the thrusters as directed. Specialists are still debating what force or abstraction could prevent the thrusters from doing their job in the emptiness of space or whether firing engines somehow did not deliver required thrust.

To make matters worse, the flight control system also perceived that thrusters had worked and thus failed to recognize that they did not provide correct parameters to the Fregat. Instead, the flight control system completed all "re-orientation" maneuvers within the assigned time and concluded that the stage was in correct attitude to continue its mission.

Beyond this short period of time, there were no deviations from the flight program. Unfortunately, it was enough to begin the following "barbecue" mode with wrong orientation of the stage toward the Sun. Even worse, when the time came to fire the Fregat's main engine for the second time, the stage was pointing in a wrong direction. Surprisingly, to highly intelligent computers onboard Fregat everything looked normal.

It seems that a coincidence of several small glitches led to the overall failure of the mission. According to European officials, there was little chance that the Galileo FOC M1 satellites could be used for their intended purpose.
 

Enjo

Mostly harmless
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Donator
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
13
Points
38
Location
Germany
Website
www.enderspace.de
Preferred Pronouns
Can't you smell my T levels?
According to European officials, there was little chance that the Galileo FOC M1 satellites could be used for their intended purpose.
Chill. They can always be used for another purpose. For example, they would still be perfect ASAT missile targets.
 

Donamy

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
6,934
Reaction score
245
Points
138
Location
Cape
Yes, then that could be used for practicing clean-up, of a massive debris field in orbit.
 

Enjo

Mostly harmless
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Donator
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
13
Points
38
Location
Germany
Website
www.enderspace.de
Preferred Pronouns
Can't you smell my T levels?
Yes, then that could be used for practicing clean-up, of a massive debris field in orbit.
Indeed. This would give the taxpayer a very good feeling in the end.
 

Cosmic Penguin

Geek Penguin in GTO
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
2
Points
63
Location
Hong Kong
Yikes! Where the ____ is QA in Russian aerospace firms!? :facepalm:

Fregat Workmanship Blamed for Soyuz Failure that Stranded Galileo Satellites in Wrong Orbit
By Peter B. de Selding | Sep. 30, 2014

TORONTO — A Europeanized version of Russia’s Soyuz rocket placed two European navigation satellites into the wrong orbit in August because of faulty installation of helium and hydrazine fuel lines on its Fregat upper stage, European government officials said.

The failure was as simple as clamping together a cold helium line with the hydrazine fuel line, causing the hydrazine to freeze long enough to upset the Fregat stage’s orientation and cause the two satellites’ release into an orbit that is both too low and in the wrong inclination, officials said.


One official said the Euro-Russian board of inquiry into the failure discovered that one in four Fregat upper stages at prime contractor Moscow-based NPO Lavochkin had the same faulty installation.

The board of inquiry is expected to release its findings the week of Oct. 6.

“We have to assume that this was a practice that had gone on in perhaps a quarter of the Fregat stages produced in the past decade, but that it had not affected our launches up to now because of mission-specific aspects like coast time between burns, the number of burns and so on, which can influence the effect of the helium on the hydrazine,” this official said. “In any case, we’d like Arianespace, which currently has almost no inspection rights on the Soyuz, to be given more say in quality assurance.”

In the stages where the installation occurred correctly, the hydrazine and helium lines were separated so that the supercold helium could not freeze the hydrazine.

The Galileo positioning, timing and navigation system is owned by the European Commission, which is the executive arm of the 28-nation European Union. The commission has charged the 20-nation European Space Agency with technical management of the program.

Government and officials said the commission is debating how to proceed now that it knows that, as expected, the Fregat failure was not one of design, but of assembly and quality control.

.......

http://www.spacenews.com/article/launch-report/42043fregat-workmanship-blamed-for-soyuz-failure-that-stranded-galileo
 

Artlav

Aperiodic traveller
Addon Developer
Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
5,791
Reaction score
782
Points
203
Location
Earth
Website
orbides.org
Preferred Pronouns
she/her
Arianespace, which currently has almost no inspection rights on the Soyuz, to be given more say in quality assurance
Huh?
That sounds stupid.
Why not let them do a second rounds of inspections?
A fresh and independent look is quite likely to find problems overlooked back home.

Yikes! Where the ____ is QA in Russian aerospace firms!? :facepalm:
There was QA back in the good old days of there being competent workers in the space industry.
But these days all the newly hired workers care about is ticking the marks in the checklists, not making sense of what they are actually doing.

Thus the square accelerometer being hammered into a round hole on the Proton.
Thus the cigarette or something being thrown into the fuel line of the Progress's upper stage.
Thus the DST settings in a chineese chip being left as is on Fobos-Grunt.
And so on.

A death of education sends out repercussions everywhere, that can not be stopped or fixed.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,484
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
A death of education sends out repercussions everywhere, that can not be stopped or fixed.

A few more years of this, and Russian astronauts travel on Iranian spacecraft to the ISS...
 

gwiz

New member
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Cornwall
It seems to be a design rather than an assembly fault. Incredibly, the drawings didn't specify where exactly the two pipes should have been routed, left it up to the assembly workers.
 

Cosmic Penguin

Geek Penguin in GTO
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
2
Points
63
Location
Hong Kong
Final report is out - while not a low-level operator QA problem, I am still baffled at the, um, freedom of pipeline routing on the Fregat. After all, this is a rocket stage, not your own DIY computer box. This and system thermal effect analyses are areas where independent insight from Arianespace would have eliminated such problems. :rolleyes:

Soyuz Flight VS09: Independent Inquiry Board announces definitive conclusions concerning the Fregat upper stage anomaly
Evry, October 8, 2014

The Independent Inquiry Board formed to analyze the causes of the anomaly occurring during the orbital injection of satellites in the Galileo constellation by a Soyuz rocket launched from the Guiana Space Center on August 22 announced its definitive conclusions on Tuesday, October 7, 2014 following a meeting at Arianespace headquarters in Evry, near Paris.

The Board was created on August 25, 2014 by Arianespace, in conjunction with the European Space Agency and the European Commission. It is chaired by Peter Dubock, former inspector-general of ESA. Its conclusions draw on data supplied by Russian partners in the program, and are consistent with the final conclusions of the inquiry board appointed by the Russian space agency Roscosmos.

The Board's conclusions confirm that the first part of the mission proceeded nominally, which means that the three-stage Soyuz launcher was not at fault.

The Inquiry Board also eliminated the hypothesis that the anomaly could have been caused by the abnormal behavior of the Galileo satellites.

The anomaly occurred during the flight of the launcher's fourth stage, Fregat, designed and produced by NPO Lavochkin. It occurred about 35 minutes after liftoff, at the beginning of the ballistic phase preceding the second ignition of this stage.

The scenario that led to an anomaly in the orbital injection of the satellites was precisely reconstructed, as follows:

  • The orbital error resulted from an error in the thrust orientation of the main engine on the Fregat stage during its second powered phase.
  • This orientation error was the result of the loss of inertial reference for the stage.
  • This loss occurred when the stage's inertial system operated outside its authorized operating envelope, an excursion that was caused by the failure of two of Fregat's attitude control thrusters during the preceeding ballistic phase.
  • This failure was due to a temporary interruption of the joint hydrazine propellant supply to these thrusters.
  • The interruption in the flow was caused by freezing of the hydrazine.
  • The freezing resulted from the proximity of hydrazine and cold helium feed lines, these lines being connected by the same support structure, which acted as a thermal bridge.
  • Ambiguities in the design documents allowed the installation of this type of thermal "bridge" between the two lines. In fact, such bridges have also been seen on other Fregat stages now under production at NPO Lavochkin.
  • The design ambiguity is the result of not taking into account the relevant thermal transfers during the thermal analyses of the stage system design.
The root cause of the anomaly on flight VS09 is therefore a shortcoming in the system thermal analysis performed during stage design, and not an operator error during stage assembly.


The system thermal analyses have been reexamined in depth to identify all areas concerned by this issue.

Given this identified and perfectly understood design fault, the Board has chosen the following corrective actions for the return to flight.

  • Revamp of the system thermal analysis.
  • Associated corrections in the design documents.
  • Modification of the documents for the manufacture, assembly, integration and inspection procedures of the supply lines.
These measures can easily and immediately be applied by NPO Lavochkin to the stages already produced, meaning that the Soyuz launcher could be available for its next mission from the Guiana Space Center as from December 2014.

Beyond theses corrective actions, sufficient for return to flight, NPO Lavotchkin will provide Arianespace with all useful information regarding Fregat’s design robustness, which is proven by 45 successful consecutive missions before this anomaly.

Following the announcement of the Independent Inquiry Board's conclusions, Stéphane Israël, Chairman and CEO of Arianespace, said: "I would first like to thank Peter Dubock, who chaired the board. Their work, with the support of Russian partners, enabled the rapid identification of the root cause of the anomaly and the corrective measures to be applied. Since the corrective measures are easy to deploy by NPO Lavochkin, we are looking at the resumption of Soyuz launches from the Guiana Space Center, as early as December 2014. The resolution of this anomaly will enable a consolidation of the reliability of Fregat, which had experienced 45 consecutive successes until this mission."
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
Satellites propulsion systems seem to be extremely reliable.
 
Top