News NASA's Future: The News and Updates Thread

fsci123

Future Dubstar and Rocketkid
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
?

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
There's some more important budget news. The White House's request for the 2015 NASA budget has been released... and it's down $254 million from 2014 levels to $17.46 billion. However, this budget is nowhere near passed and funding items can change. According to this proposal, the unexpectedly expensive SOFIA would be temporarily shelved to free up $85 million for other missions like Cassini, which is bittersweet. Continued funding for the long-lived Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Opportunity spacecraft is uncertain with conflicting information, but funds for the asteroid redirect initiative have increased. Like previous White House requests, the Commercial Crew Program is funded at a full $848 million, but this amount has been historically been reduced by Congress. Europa Clipper and WFIRST are dedicated a rather small amount for further formulation. Education has been slashed to under $100 million, while Aeronautics funding remains pretty flat along with adequate support for SLS and Orion.

Account FY14 Omnibus FY15 PBR FY15 PBR + OGSI SCIENCE $5,151.2 $4,972.0 $5,159.3
- Earth Science $1,826.0 $1,770.3
- Planetary Science $1,345.0 $1,280.3
- Astrophysics $668.0 $607.3
- JWST $658.2 $645.4
- Heliophysics $654.0 $668.9
SPACE TECHNOLOGY $576.0 $705.5 $805.5
AERONAUTICS $566.0 $551.1 $595.0
EXPLORATION SYSTEMS $4,113.2 $3,976.0 $4,326.0
- SLS/Orion $3,115.2 $2,784.4
- Commercial Spaceflight $696.0 $848.3
- Exploration R&D $302.0 $343.4
SPACE OPERATIONS $3,778.0 $3,905.4 $4,006.0
- ISS n/a $3,050.8
- Space and Flight Support n/a $854.6
EDUCATION $116.6 $88.9 $98.9
CROSS AGENCY SUPPORT $2,793.0 $2,778.6 $2,778.6
CONSTRUCTION $515.0 $446.1 $539.8
INSPECTOR GENERAL $37.5 $37.0 $37.0
TOTAL $17,646.5 $17,460.6 $18,346.1

Resources:
Space Politics: "NASA FY 2015 budget supports asteroids, Europa, and commercial crew, but sacrifices SOFIA"
The Planetary Society: "To Europa!...Slowly.: First Impressions of the 2015 NASA Budget Request"
Universe Today: "BUDGET 2015: Flying SOFIA Telescope To Be Shelved For ‘Higher-Priority’ Programs Like Cassini"


Meanwhile, space station operations continues normally despite high tensions in Ukraine.
 

RGClark

Mathematician
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
1
Points
36
Location
Philadelphia
Website
exoscientist.blogspot.com
... Like previous White House requests, the Commercial Crew Program is funded at a full $848 million, but this amount has been historically been reduced by Congress.
...

Account FY14 Omnibus FY15 PBR FY15 PBR + OGSI SCIENCE $5,151.2 $4,972.0 $5,159.3
- Earth Science $1,826.0 $1,770.3
- Planetary Science $1,345.0 $1,280.3
- Astrophysics $668.0 $607.3
- JWST $658.2 $645.4
- Heliophysics $654.0 $668.9
SPACE TECHNOLOGY $576.0 $705.5 $805.5
AERONAUTICS $566.0 $551.1 $595.0
EXPLORATION SYSTEMS $4,113.2 $3,976.0 $4,326.0
- SLS/Orion $3,115.2 $2,784.4
- Commercial Spaceflight $696.0 $848.3
- Exploration R&D $302.0 $343.4
SPACE OPERATIONS $3,778.0 $3,905.4 $4,006.0
- ISS n/a $3,050.8
- Space and Flight Support n/a $854.6
EDUCATION $116.6 $88.9 $98.9
CROSS AGENCY SUPPORT $2,793.0 $2,778.6 $2,778.6
CONSTRUCTION $515.0 $446.1 $539.8
INSPECTOR GENERAL $37.5 $37.0 $37.0
TOTAL $17,646.5 $17,460.6 $18,346.1
Resources:
Space Politics: "NASA FY 2015 budget supports asteroids, Europa, and commercial crew, but sacrifices SOFIA"
...


Meanwhile, space station operations continues normally despite high tensions in Ukraine.


Thanks for that. Let's hope now Congress will see the wisdom of rapidly achieving a U.S. independent space access capability.


Bob Clark
 

RGClark

Mathematician
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
1
Points
36
Location
Philadelphia
Website
exoscientist.blogspot.com
SpaceX has already said that with funding they can make manned launches by 2015. I found this earlier article from 2012 that said with funding Boeing could also launch their CST-100 spacecraft by 2015:

Boeing anticipates CST-100 orbital flight tests in 2016.
BY STEPHEN CLARK
SPACEFLIGHT NOW
Posted: April 11, 2012
...The appropriation forced NASA to revise its forecast for the beginning of operational commercial crew missions from 2016 to 2017. The start of commercial crew service would come after a series of test flights by the spacecraft's private operators.
Even a $500 million award likely would delay Boeing's flight test program beyond 2015, according to Mulholland.
"With appropriate funding, we still can support a 2015 entry into service. I would say, and I can't be real specific on it, to hold the 2015 date, we would need, it appears, slightly more than the $300 million to $500 million in the base period," Mulholland said.
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1204/11cst100/

Cuts to NASA's commercial crew program forced the agency to push back manned launches to 2017. Recent events however have now given impetus to re-accelerate the program. Achieving U.S. launch independence is of such importance that sufficient funding should be provided to reach the original 2015 launch date.

I would not favor just having SpaceX as the only provider. Experience with the shuttle has shown how damaging that can be when that single provider for manned launches goes down. Also, last year Orbital Sciences had to make a cargo supply launch to the ISS in place of SpaceX when SpaceX couldn't launch in time.

The Atlas V over dozens of launches has been proven to be highly reliable. This is something the Falcon 9 at this point does not yet have. The Atlas V also has the flexibility to launch either the CST-100 or Dreamchaser, whichever is ready and available.

The preferred route then should be to have at least two independent launch providers for manned launches.


Bob Clark
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
The President's budget proposal indeed does not include funds to continue the Opportunity or LRO missions.

Operating+missions.jpg

InSight, OSIRIS-REx, and the Mars 2020 rover (in that order) are the only NASA planetary missions that are scheduled for launch in this decade. However, the Discovery Program is being strongly supported with selections up to every two years as envisioned, but any future New Frontiers and Flagship missions have a bleak outlook. Resources will hopefully be freed by the 2020s, but these cuts cannot support near-future activity. Europa has official support, but a mission is unaffordable until the next decade.

{colsp=2}

Planetary+mission+programs.jpg
|
Missions+in+development.jpg

For more information on the budget, see the link below.
Future Planetary Exploration: "2015 Planetary Science Proposed Budget – Steady as she goes and then big changes"
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
NPR: "NASA Suspends Some Ties With Russia Over Ukraine Crisis"

"Given Russia's ongoing violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, NASA is suspending the majority of its ongoing engagements with the Russian Federation," the agency said. "NASA and Roscosmos will, however, continue to work together to maintain safe and continuous operation of the International Space Station."

[...]
 

boogabooga

Bug Crusher
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Perhaps there would be some advantages to the space program to be back in the Cold War.
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/w...ontact-with-russia.html?hpw&rref=science&_r=1

NASA Breaks Most Contact With Russia

Over the years of collaboration, the Russian-American partnership in space has continued largely immune to the geopolitical ups and downs between Washington and Moscow, and as recently as a few weeks ago officials expressed optimism that would still be the case, with the NASA administrator, Charles F. Bolden Jr., saying, “Right now, everything is normal in our relationship with the Russians.”

...

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has also directed the Air Force to review the use of Russian engines in rockets that send American military satellites into orbit. The Atlas 5 rockets, now produced by a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin, have been built for years with Russian-made RD-180 engines. American officials are exploring the consequences of possible supply interruptions.

...

The decision to suspend the relationship with the Russian space agency is unusual for several reasons, not least because keeping the space enterprises alive has long been a symbol of Washington’s commitment to an apolitical working relationship with Moscow. Breaking it, some government officials have feared, would invite the Russians to retaliate by suspending nuclear inspections under the new Start treaty — inspections that have continued despite the differences over Ukraine.

But the Obama administration’s decision was made easier by the dwindling nature of the nation’s space program. Grand plans for international space programs have largely withered, as the space shuttle program has ground to an end. “There’s a sense that we don’t need the space relationships the way we once did,” one senior government scientist said, “because we don’t have as much going on in space.”
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
Worked the first time.

True, when nobody yet knew what's out there on Mars, Venus and the back side of the Moon. Now the average guy just scrolls by another new boring image of Mars or Saturn on his iPad. Are you going to sell him a new space race idea for the sake of supremacy of... what over what? One country in one Earth hemisphere over another country basically just like it, in another hemisphere? There's no even ideology breach today which could be played upon.

Will not work this time. I'm just seeing the space exploration is being sacrificed for no valid reason.
 

MattBaker

New member
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
2,750
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Worked the first time.

That's the point, it was done already.

"Look, we've gone to the Moon!" - "Yeah, we did so half a century ago..." - "True, this is boring, let's get a beer and watch the Giants game."
 

vchamp

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
221
Reaction score
6
Points
18
I'm just seeing the space exploration is being sacrificed for no valid reason.

The reason is valid enough. It's not acceptable and dangerous to continue cooperation with country-aggressor who violates international laws in such shameless manner. I don't see a place for such Russia in future space programs.
 

Artlav

Aperiodic traveller
Addon Developer
Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
5,790
Reaction score
780
Points
203
Location
Earth
Website
orbides.org
Preferred Pronouns
she/her
“There’s a sense that we don’t need the space relationships the way we once did,” one senior government scientist said, “because we don’t have as much going on in space.”
Wow.
I expected the line to end "because currently we don't have domestic launch capabilities, and need an impetus to develop it". Or something like that.

That sounds almost like they are taking this as an opportunity to toss NASA into the garbage bin.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,605
Reaction score
2,327
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
The reason is valid enough. It's not acceptable and dangerous to continue cooperation with country-aggressor who violates international laws in such shameless manner. I don't see a place for such Russia in future space programs.

While I agree on the Analysis and the Need to react, I don't think that the western world is really honest to itself there.

We sacrifice a lot, that elites consider not important, including spaceflight, while still doing Business as usual when it is about the Money in the wallets of the richest 1% of all our countries (including Russia).

Crimea is better discussed elsewhere, but I really would like to state here, that neither NASA nor ESA nor RSA is a toy for the politicians to Play with, but a serious Business, vital Service AND important factor for the science and education in our countries.

To misquote Kissinger: Spaceflight is too important to be left in the hands of politicians.
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
SpaceNews: "Senate Confirms Newman As NASA Deputy Administrator"
5bFrglz.jpg
The U.S. Senate voted unanimously April 27 to confirm Dava Newman as NASA’s deputy administrator, more than six months after the university professor was nominated to the post.

The Senate voted 87–0 to confirm Newman after a brief floor debate about the nomination. Only two senators spoke during the debate, both in favor of Newman’s nomination.

“Administrator [Charles] Bolden does not have a deputy, and he needs a deputy administrator,” said Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.). He said in his comments on the Senate floor that NASA “sifted through hundreds of names” before choosing Newman.

“We need a professional in there to help Gen. Bolden along with his very dedicated team,” Nelson said. “We should confirm her today.”

The only other senator to speak in favor of Newman’s nomination was Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who noted that Newman was a native of Montana. “I know she will lead with honor and is prepared for whatever challenges may lie ahead,” he said in brief remarks.

The vote was welcomed by both Bolden and Newman. “I am personally ecstatic to welcome her aboard at such a busy and exciting time,” Bolden said in a NASA statement issued shortly after the vote.

“It’s an enormous honor to serve at NASA in times when our country is extending humanity’s reach into space while strengthening American leadership here on Earth,” Newman said in the same statement.

The White House initially nominated Newman, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to the position Oct. 16. The administration resubmitted the nomination Jan. 8 after the new Congress convened. The Senate Commerce Committee favorably reported the nomination out of committee on March 25 on a voice vote, without discussion.

In recent weeks, Bolden had made more of a public case for the Senate to confirm Newman. He mentioned the pending nomination at a March 12 hearing of the Senate Commerce space subcommittee, which Newman attended. He also told the NASA Advisory Council at an April 9 meeting that he planned to meet with the Senate’s Republican leadership to request a confirmation vote for Newman.

Prior to the nomination, Newman was best known for her spaceflight research, including development of advanced spacesuit concepts. She served on the technical panel that supported the National Research Council’s Committee on Human Spaceflight during its work on a report completed last year outlining several “pathways” for human space exploration.

Newman also served on the National Research Council’s Space Studies Board. She attended a meeting of the board in Washington April 22–23 but kept a low profile during the public portions of the two-day meeting.

NASA, in its statement about the confirmation, did not indicate when Newman would be formally sworn in as deputy administrator. The position has been vacant since Lori Garver left the agency in September 2013.
 

boogabooga

Bug Crusher
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Wow. You NEVER see the Senate vote unanimously on anything.

Dava Newman was highlighted on NOVA Science Now's episode "Can we make it to Mars?"

Her research was in making high mobility spacesuits. IIRC, she was working on a suit that partially used physical pressure rather than being inflated. (i.e. it squeezed around the body)

I find it hopeful that someone was chosen who was working on getting us to Mars. :)
 
Top