Urwumpe, I was a bit shocked a moment before when I saw your harsh reply on Nexis post about the slip stream drive. Now I found this, and I finally know what you meant...
@Nexis:
I suggest you a very simple experiment: invest some 1000 to 2000 bucks in a good amateurs telescope (A cheaper one should do the trick to, but after all you want to be CERTAIN, don't you)?
Now, set it up and look at Jupiter for a while. You will notice that he is QUITE well visible with your telescope, and when observing carefully you should even be able to spot its moons without too much trouble.
Now, since Planet X should be similiarly sized (so goes at least the official "theory", I haven't re-read what you posted first), yoou just look where it should be, and you will be able to see it clearly, if it's there. If it isn't anywhere behind the orbit of neptune, you should even be able to see it with your bare eyes on a very clear night. But, you want to be sure, so get the telescope!
What is that? don't know exactly where to point the telescope? well... Surely the ones providing the theories will have some calculations on the trajectory of the planet? After all they know that it's going to hit earth, and they even know the exact date, so they have to know the exact trajectory. They didn't tell? Why, screw that! I thought they wanted to make the thing public, since teh 3v1l gouvernement is trying to hide it. All they had to do for making it public would be to reveal the trajectory, and every observatory, every hobby astronomer, indeed everyone with a reasonably effective binocular could look at the right place at the right time and would see it. Or not. Because there's nothing there. Which is also a very plausible reason for not revealing the trajectory. Even then, someone would have noticed it. An object the size of Jupiter CANNOT go unnoticed in our night sky if it's allready inside the system. It simply can't!
(the same goes for alien spaceships with antimatter drives, for that matter).
