OHM Space Launch System for Orbiter 2016 0.1.2

[gattispilot]

Is any one working or do we have the Logistic Modules? One is a Space X Dragon.

 

[MarkWatney2015]

Is any one working or do we have the Logistic Modules? One is a Space X Dragon.

There is an existing Dragon-XL spacecraft included on francisdrake's Starship HLS addon. As for the HTV-X, there's none yet

 

[gattispilot]

Thanks. Well at least one thing less to do

 

[gattispilot]

So looking at the Canadarm3 again.
https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/iss/canadarm2/canadarm-canadarm2-canadarm3-comparative-table.asp

The big differences are length and boom diameter.

So I can shorten the booms to make the total length 8.5 meters. The C2 is 17 meters long

On the boom diameters. c3 is 23cm c3 is 34 cm I can redo the booms to be 23cm.

BUT. I wonder if the joints and effector ends should remain the same. Or be reduced to match the booms?


How do you fold/un fold the SSRMSD?

 

[Donamy]

The joints have to be : SR=0, SY=0, SP=0, E=180, WP=180, WY=180, WR=0
then press K.

 

[gattispilot]

I am going to go with this:
trying to get the SSRMS code to work for this. But getting lots of errors.
I can get it to move and attach,.... using old code

 

[gattispilot]

I got it to work. Thanks for @Gondos .

I got my smaller arm to load. But I thin another difference between C2 and C3 and the angle difference.
Each of Canadarm2's joints rotate 270 degrees in each direction, a total of 540 degrees.
const double JOINT_LIMITS[2] = {-280.0, +280.0}; const double JOINT_SOFTSTOPS[2] = {-270.0, +270.0}; // from ISS ROBO Console Handbook, 1.2-29 (p. 58)

but c3 is almost 360.
Each joint will be able to rotate almost 360 degrees.
so maybe:
const double JOINT_LIMITS[2] = {-360.0, +360.0}; const double JOINT_SOFTSTOPS[2] = {-350.0, +350.0}; // from ISS ROBO Console Handbook, 1.2-29 (p. 58)

 

[gattispilot]

Redoing/looking at the Gateway. With emphasis of attachment points. On the airlock you can see in the red circles they are rms targets. but the green circles are they RMS targets and just shown differently

 

[Buck Rogers]

They look very different, looks more like cable/power connections?

 

[gattispilot]

They look very different, looks more like cable/power connections?

Yes. they sink in rather than stick out with the grapple fixture? I may just place the fixtures there.

 

[gattispilot]

Looking to redo the ESPRIT. MAybe make an interior? But again sunken holes versus rms grapple.

 

[Donamy]

They look more like attachments for the ERA.

 

[gattispilot]

They look more like attachments for the ERA.

What is the ERA? I know they should have attachments for Canadarm3

 

[Buck Rogers]

Here's a couple of interesting PDFs on ISS attachements
https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/APSMEX/pdf_files/5_2014_Astro_Exp_PPC_ISSAccommodation_Jules.pdf
https://smd-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/ISS_Accom-110612.pdf
The closest I can see are EFU connecters?

 

[gattispilot]

Redoing the airlock, I habitat, Haloppe. added Rms targets.

I may redo the Halo/ppe. I think it is looks like 1 vessel. I have 2 docks there. Not sure the arm would be attached for the launch. As it sticks out of the Fairing.

 

[gattispilot]

New Halo/PPE. With the C3 arm.

Since it moves from attachment to attachment. Seems that the arrangement should be similar?

I would say a attachment on top of the Ihabitat. so the the arm could move down.

You see with the arm attached on the side how it would stick out for launch.

 

[gattispilot]

I saw this. This might explain the different fixtures. Might redesign the arm??

 

[gattispilot]

Here is the ESPRIT Fuel transfer unit. It has the new arm connector.

I might go back to the starlab and put a mfd or 2 in the VC?

BUt now my Artemis ctd ever so often

 

[gattispilot]

I got her to launch on a Falcon HVY. I am not sure about the arm and grapple points. I saw an image with a grapple point on the end of the PPE. But not sure if the arm can reach the attachment in the PPE?? Maybe the target is on the side?

 

[barrygolden]

Is that RMS shorter than the SSRMS