Can you fix these?
View attachment 15843
These you fixed them already but now show again
View attachment 15844
View attachment 15843
These you fixed them already but now show again
View attachment 15844
Last edited:
Those have been fixed. I have no idea what's going on with the nosecap. Even Donamy's fixed version shows the same issue whenever I remap it to the original texture location.Can you fix these?
View attachment 15843
These you fixed them already but now show again
View attachment 15844
Except for the OMS pods, everything is looking good here. I have checked in a version that has the grey areas fixed.Some other new small issues I noticed
There is a line that cuts and splits the RCS nozzles
View attachment 15845
View attachment 15846
The black HRSI in between the OMS pods have now 2 rectangular grey portions areas left and right of the rudder insertion
View attachment 15847
The left main landing gear door seems displaced: there is a gap where you can see through
View attachment 15848
the other gear door seems to be uneffected
View attachment 15849
Except for the OMS pods, everything is looking good here. I have checked in a version that has the grey areas fixed.
What is the revision of your Orbiter.msh? You can check this by right-clicking on the file and selecting Properties from the context menu and then going to the Subversion tab. WC Revision should say 2849. Same for last changed revision.So you do not see the other glitches... :huh:? Anyone else can check that out please?
What is the revision of your Orbiter.msh? You can check this by right-clicking on the file and selecting Properties from the context menu and then going to the Subversion tab. WC Revision should say 2849. Same for last changed revision.
These issues should now be a thing of the past. Revision 2850 this time.2849 recompiled, gear door issue fixed. This is the situation now:
RCS nozzles still show this
View attachment 15851
View attachment 15852
OMS pod new issue
View attachment 15853
View attachment 15854
There is a cut in the textures right behind the nose cap
View attachment 15855
Sharp edges on the sides of the belly
View attachment 15856
(sorry for the potential off-topic)
I noticed that the nose gear doors are not as they should: in reality one is larger than the other. Shouldn't this be corrected now, so that in the future things don't have to be changed again?
The above reported issues should now be fixed.2850 new issues
BELLY-WINGS
the elevons HRSI contours and the RCC/HRSI at the wingtip are displaced. Also the belly show a diagonal line of deformed tiles (from the wingtip going inward and up)
View attachment 15858
the nose gear door lower seam has an issue and ET attachment plate is now cut and separated in two
View attachment 15859
Both wingtips HRSI show a white LRSI section
View attachment 15860
RCC on both wings are displaced and there is a gap where you can see through the Orbiter structure
View attachment 15861
View attachment 15862
The starboard outer elevon trailing edge HRSI "jigsaw pattern" shows now this sort of duplication. Also its inner black tiles contour in the fixed wing section is now missing
View attachment 15864
The View attachment 15863
FRCS starboard side nozzles are displaced
View attachment 15866
Finally something I noticed before rev 2850 but still there: a hump on the upper nose section. Don't know if it has always been there
View attachment 15865
This is for 4.2??? So why are changes being made on the mesh in the trunk? :idk: :idk: :idk:Are you referring to SSU 5.0? I am working now on 4.2 and the underbody texture is like the default Atlantis and the Fleet: I work on one half of it only, hence everything symmetrical (like the nose gear door) is just an exact specular copy of its original half.
The above reported issues should now be fixed.
Yes, STS-6 was the only time OMS pods that used AFRSI on the front faces. The reason why the went back was that they after some more wind tunnel testing found that the AFRSI couldn't withstand the vortices that was generated by the wings. So after some more wind tunnel testing they came up with the HRSI "eyeballs" configuration. For next few flights while her own OMS pods was being reconfigured, Challenger used Columbia's OMS pods while she was being modified to support STS-9.AFAIK in the subsequent mission STS-7 they went back to the LRSI.
Was STS-6 the only time when Challenger had such a configuration and why was the AFRSI dropped (maybe thermal issues or blankets wear?). I know they had some TPS problems right in the OMS POD area (you can see from the picture aswell). Maybe that's the reason why?
Columbia's OMS pod configuration for flights 1-6: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kd1awbj6m3zivkh/STS1-0669-NOID-2.81.jpg?dl=0Is anyone in posses of some pictures of the upper side of the early Columbia or Challenger OMS PODS?
I'd like to repaint them for SSU but I am only able to reproduce the lower side (only pic available is shot from bottom towards the top)
Thanks