Project SSU HI RES Textures

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
Last edited:

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
Question for the team and SSU users on the rudder textures


I have added a "seam pattern" that reflects the one showed on the default SSU textures. Looking at the Orbiter rudder pictures though I can't see this pattern (the tiles seams are all even). IMHO the effect is cool but maybe not that realistic



This is how it looks

View attachment 15850


Pro or versus?
 
Last edited:

Donamy

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
6,934
Reaction score
245
Points
138
Location
Cape
Don't like it.
 

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203
Some other new small issues I noticed


There is a line that cuts and splits the RCS nozzles

View attachment 15845
View attachment 15846


The black HRSI in between the OMS pods have now 2 rectangular grey portions areas left and right of the rudder insertion

View attachment 15847


The left main landing gear door seems displaced: there is a gap where you can see through
View attachment 15848


the other gear door seems to be uneffected
View attachment 15849
Except for the OMS pods, everything is looking good here. I have checked in a version that has the grey areas fixed.
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
Except for the OMS pods, everything is looking good here. I have checked in a version that has the grey areas fixed.


So you do not see the other glitches... :huh:? Anyone else can check that out please?
 

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203
So you do not see the other glitches... :huh:? Anyone else can check that out please?
What is the revision of your Orbiter.msh? You can check this by right-clicking on the file and selecting Properties from the context menu and then going to the Subversion tab. WC Revision should say 2849. Same for last changed revision.
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
What is the revision of your Orbiter.msh? You can check this by right-clicking on the file and selecting Properties from the context menu and then going to the Subversion tab. WC Revision should say 2849. Same for last changed revision.


2849 recompiled, gear door issue fixed. This is the situation now:


RCS nozzles still show this


View attachment 15851
View attachment 15852


OMS pod new issue
View attachment 15853

View attachment 15854


There is a cut in the textures right behind the nose cap
View attachment 15855


Sharp edges on the sides of the belly
View attachment 15856
 
Last edited:

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
2850 new issues


BELLY-WINGS


the elevons HRSI contours and the RCC/HRSI at the wingtip are displaced. Also the belly show a diagonal line of deformed tiles (from the wingtip going inward and up)
BELLY ELEVON CONTOURS DSPLCMNT .jpg


the nose gear door lower seam has an issue and ET attachment plate is now cut and separated in two
NOSE GEAR DOOR AND ET ATT PLATE.jpg


Both wingtips HRSI show a white LRSI section
HRSI WINGTIPS.jpg


RCC on both wings are displaced and there is a gap where you can see through the Orbiter structure
RCC 01.jpg
RCC 2.jpg



The starboard outer elevon trailing edge HRSI "jigsaw pattern" shows now this sort of duplication. Also its inner black tiles contour in the fixed wing section is now missing
STBD outer elevon issue.jpg


The View attachment 15863


FRCS starboard side nozzles are displaced
STBD FRCS NOZZLES DISPLCMNT.jpg


Finally something I noticed before rev 2850 but still there: a hump on the upper nose section. Don't know if it has always been there
NOSE HUMP.jpg
 
Last edited:

GLS

Well-known member
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
6,030
Reaction score
3,074
Points
188
Website
github.com
(sorry for the potential off-topic)
I noticed that the nose gear doors are not as they should: in reality one is larger than the other. Shouldn't this be corrected now, so that in the future things don't have to be changed again?
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
(sorry for the potential off-topic)
I noticed that the nose gear doors are not as they should: in reality one is larger than the other. Shouldn't this be corrected now, so that in the future things don't have to be changed again?


Are you referring to SSU 5.0? I am working now on 4.2 and the underbody texture is like the default Atlantis and the Fleet: I work on one half of it only, hence everything symmetrical (like the nose gear door) is just an exact specular copy of its original half.
 

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203
2850 new issues


BELLY-WINGS


the elevons HRSI contours and the RCC/HRSI at the wingtip are displaced. Also the belly show a diagonal line of deformed tiles (from the wingtip going inward and up)
View attachment 15858


the nose gear door lower seam has an issue and ET attachment plate is now cut and separated in two
View attachment 15859


Both wingtips HRSI show a white LRSI section
View attachment 15860


RCC on both wings are displaced and there is a gap where you can see through the Orbiter structure
View attachment 15861
View attachment 15862



The starboard outer elevon trailing edge HRSI "jigsaw pattern" shows now this sort of duplication. Also its inner black tiles contour in the fixed wing section is now missing
View attachment 15864


The View attachment 15863


FRCS starboard side nozzles are displaced
View attachment 15866


Finally something I noticed before rev 2850 but still there: a hump on the upper nose section. Don't know if it has always been there
View attachment 15865
The above reported issues should now be fixed.
 

GLS

Well-known member
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
6,030
Reaction score
3,074
Points
188
Website
github.com
Are you referring to SSU 5.0? I am working now on 4.2 and the underbody texture is like the default Atlantis and the Fleet: I work on one half of it only, hence everything symmetrical (like the nose gear door) is just an exact specular copy of its original half.
This is for 4.2??? So why are changes being made on the mesh in the trunk? :idk: :idk: :idk:
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
The above reported issues should now be fixed.


Thanks, much better now. There are still a few minor issues but I think it is maybe better to leave the mesh as they are for the moment
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
I found out that Challenger on her first mission (STS-6) had the fwd section of the OMS pods equipped with AFRSI instead of LRSI tiles
STS-6 Orbit A (80).jpg


AFAIK in the subsequent mission STS-7 they went back to the LRSI.
Was STS-6 the only time when Challenger had such a configuration and why was the AFRSI dropped (maybe thermal issues or blankets wear?). I know they had some TPS problems right in the OMS POD area (you can see from the picture aswell). Maybe that's the reason why?
 
Last edited:

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203
AFAIK in the subsequent mission STS-7 they went back to the LRSI.
Was STS-6 the only time when Challenger had such a configuration and why was the AFRSI dropped (maybe thermal issues or blankets wear?). I know they had some TPS problems right in the OMS POD area (you can see from the picture aswell). Maybe that's the reason why?
Yes, STS-6 was the only time OMS pods that used AFRSI on the front faces. The reason why the went back was that they after some more wind tunnel testing found that the AFRSI couldn't withstand the vortices that was generated by the wings. So after some more wind tunnel testing they came up with the HRSI "eyeballs" configuration. For next few flights while her own OMS pods was being reconfigured, Challenger used Columbia's OMS pods while she was being modified to support STS-9.
 

Wolf

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
11
Points
38
Location
Milan
Is anyone in posses of some pictures of the upper side of the early Columbia or Challenger OMS PODS?
I'd like to repaint them for SSU but I am only able to reproduce the lower side (only pic available is shot from bottom towards the top)


Thanks :)
 

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,478
Reaction score
732
Points
203
Is anyone in posses of some pictures of the upper side of the early Columbia or Challenger OMS PODS?
I'd like to repaint them for SSU but I am only able to reproduce the lower side (only pic available is shot from bottom towards the top)


Thanks :)
Columbia's OMS pod configuration for flights 1-6: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kd1awbj6m3zivkh/STS1-0669-NOID-2.81.jpg?dl=0


Challenger's OMS pods for flight 1: https://www.dropbox.com/s/togum8arpoumbqw/STS6-113-NOID.jpg?dl=0
 
Top