The 10 most ridiculous lawsuits of all time

While I don't blame video games completely for stuff like Columbine (after all I play alot of games myself), there are some games that I'm pretty sure do exacerbate existing psychological problems that the kids who do these things have.

Quite possibly true. The key point is that the kid has psychological problems in the first place though, and these problems could probably be exacerbated by watching a film or even reading a book. What are you to do? Lock the kid up in a grey room with no form of entertainment whatsoever just on the off-chance that he might go nuts?
 
Quite possibly true. The key point is that the kid has psychological problems in the first place though, and these problems could probably be exacerbated by watching a film or even reading a book. What are you to do? Lock the kid up in a grey room with no form of entertainment whatsoever just on the off-chance that he might go nuts?

Are you crazy? Such kids must get killed by a chemical cocktail right before it could harm somebody. We must be kept safe! I don't want to imagine, our own kids could go to the same school as such psychos!:dry:
 
Lock the kid up in a grey room with no form of entertainment whatsoever just on the off-chance that he might go nuts?

well, no... but parents could observe their kids a bit better these days. It really is not an easy world for kids if noone tells them what to NOT do! but we're hijacking the thread here... :sorry:
 
well, no... but parents could observe their kids a bit better these days. It really is not an easy world for kids if noone tells them what to NOT do! but we're hijacking the thread here... :sorry:

Ya... lets not drag Jack Thompson over here by misstake, shall we?
 
If they really believed that the chicken had laid a basilisk egg, then it seems to me that the chicken should have been deemed a hero, and bred as much as possible. They ought to have realized the incredible military potential of such eggs.
 
I'm gonna sue...

1) My mother, for having given birth to me and thus causing me intolerable anguish
2) Myself for not dealing with said anguish in an appropriate way and thus exacerbating the condition
3) Every single member of the human race for negligence in not recognising my anguish and thereby conspiring with my mother and myself to worsen my trauma

I'm off to California now to find me a shyster attorney. Here's lookin' at the millions...

Aw no. Are you emo? Do you have a MySpace page? Hide the razors!
 
One woman tried to sue an airline because of turbulance during her flight. Maybe it was so turbulant because the pilot was struggling to keep the plane level, seeing how FAT she was:lol:
 
She wasn't fat, she was gravitically relevant.

You mean she was the cause for massive inertia coupling, which nearly led to loss of the aircraft? :rofl:
 
Ya... lets not drag Jack Thompson over here by misstake, shall we?

this Jack Thompson?

CADJackFull.jpg
 
I wonder if you can sue the gun company's for doing this to yourself
:suicide:
 
suing gun-companies in the U.S. might be a difficult task for whatever reasons... :dry:
 
EDIT:

Al Yankovic - I'll sue ya

I hope this is now better, I did not realize that it does not allow embedding, my fault.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised that 2 cases didn't make the list:

The "Highway Man Case", which I had to learn about in law school, involved 1 highwayman suing his partner in crime over an unequal division of the spoils. This led to the harshest punishment for frivolous pleading ever: the learned judge ordered both plaintiff and defendant hanged, and both their lawyers deported as indentured servants :rofl:

The other case is the old lady who sued McDonalds for making hot coffee. As she was leaving the drive-through window, she spilled it in her lap and got scalded. She actually WON like $20,000,000 for that, and ever since all fast food coffee cups have had warning labels about hot contents. :WTF: Would she have sued if the coffee had been cold?

I met her lawyer shortly afterwards because my law school had him come give a lecture on this case as an example to us all. He said that one of his key points was showing that the coffee in her cup was nearly 300^F. I nearly puked about that. For them as don't know thermodynamics, it's flat impossible to have what is almost all water that hot at ambient atmospheric pressure. If it was that hot, she'd have had a cup of steam. I hammered the lawyer on this. But what made me sick was that not only was he able to convince the judge and the 12 idiots on the jury about it, but nobody in the whole McDonalds organization brought this up, either. :stupidsmack:

This is the type of idiots setting public policy. All judges and damn near all legislators are lawyers, so by definition they know nothing of the real world. And most people are too stupid to realize this. It really makes me hope for a global pandemic or nuclear annihilation as a remedial measure :suicide:
 
The other case is the old lady who sued McDonalds for making hot coffee. As she was leaving the drive-through window, she spilled it in her lap and got scalded. She actually WON like $20,000,000 for that, and ever since all fast food coffee cups have had warning labels about hot contents. :WTF:

Actually, that case was mentioned right at the end of the article to which the OP points (Was it was added after you read the article? Hmmm... maybe they read your post.).

So, what about the infamous McDonald’s coffee case – the one that kicked it all off? We all know that coffee is hot, that’s not in question. What most people don’t know is that McDonald’s was serving their coffee at about 180-190 degrees...
 
Back
Top