Question Which Buran is better?

orbitingpluto

Orbiteer
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
618
Reaction score
0
Points
16
So there is three Buran addons at Orbit hanger: C[ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=755"]VEL-Buran[/ame], [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=2181"]BURAN2[/ame], and [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=458"]Buran3.03Beta[/ame]. The question is which is the best. I read on the forums that none are fantastic, and there seems to be a group of Orbinauts out there that have asked for a good Buran to use. I found that I can hook the stock Atlantis up to a Energia and if I squint it almost looks like a proper Buran... from about a km away.:lol: So thats what their competing with, and I would like it if people respond with comparisons between the stock Atlatis and the three Burans, as Atlantis could pretend to be a Buran and fly as one on a Energia. Although I tried Atlantis on a Energia and it works, I would like the thing Energia was built to use. For one thing, the Buran doesn't have to lug around those darn SSMEs...
 
I looked at all of them myself. They stink. Almost makes me want to make my own Buran.:dry:

The Above is henceforth retracted by me and I apologize to all for saying it. I feel very guilty for saying the above and I will sincerely think harder about what I write before I post.


 
Last edited:
It was asinine of me to say that. The people that made those Burans had to work at making them, and since I haven't done a damn thing I should hold my tongue.

Three cheers to those who contribute to Orbiter!
:cheers:
:cheers:
:cheers:
 
It is pretty rude to say that an addon sucks without even understanding how to make one.
 
As creator of one of them, I am truly sorry, for not making an addon to your liking and promise a full refund, ... oh wait.
 
As creator of one of them, I am truly sorry, for not making an addon to your liking and promise a full refund, ... oh wait.
Well, your Buran mesh is starting to show its age compared to the current US shuttle meshes. It could benefit from a modernization.
 
The Buran program itself could benefit a modernization :P
 
orbitingpluto, a nice option would be to create a simple Buran using one of the meshes and configuring it using spacecraft.dll . You only need notepad for that and you can use Atlantis as reference :).

One thing that I'd like to see on a Buran would be a nice VC. There are detailed images of the instrument panels. It's something I wouldn't mind doing as part of a larger effort.
 
Since OP is obviously sorry, I think there's no need for further bashing from me. Anyway, getting the thread back on track...
As a question of "Which is better," I think the only real advantage of any one Buran is the CVEL support on CVEL Buran, and that doesn't amount to a whole lot of difference. None had working RMS. That was some time ago, so maybe I'm forgetting something...
What aerodynamic models do they use? I think that's one major difference that might change the answer.

Also, where is there detailed information on the cockpit? I searched before and came up kind of empty. I don't know Russian, so yeah.
Either way, Buran 1.0 never got fitted for manned flight (although it was close), and most of the the photos I found were low res shots of the stripped down OK-TVA. Ayayayaya...
 
Last edited:
http://www.buran.ru/
3d-bur05.jpg
 
Last edited:
4throck said:
No Russian needed (I know 0 Russian) but Google is your friend... just search for Buran cockpit for example.
:facepalm: Wow. I could've swore I did that. I guess I didn't account for the fact that the Internet is a series of tubes. Thanks for the prod of "look again, doofus!" :P
 
Donamy has every right to be mad, and so does every person who has contributed a addon and feels that this forum should be a place where a work should be given its due and not bashed without a detailed and thoughtful analysis that at least tries, if a addon really had shortcomings, to offer constructive criticism. I did not offer my best, and stooped to a low level; giving only a two word and very uninformative assessment that lumped all the Burans together and told next to nothing about the individual merits/faults of each. I even used a sense organ that couldn't possibly have been used for testing the Burans, as software has no smell! I didn't even comply with what I asked in the starting post; that all judgments on which is the better Buran include a comparison to the stock Atlantis. These failings are wholly mine, and worse still I type a long and perhaps incredibly boring wall of text that doesn't even come close to making up for my shortcomings. Though I will eat my words and say I am going about learning how to make my own Buran. I do believe that the Burans we currently have on OrbitHanger are lacking compared to the stock Atlantis, and since there is no body else doing anything either I can man up and fill the need or whine like a damn teenager. I feel like its time I man up.

I want to close by saying that I do not think that this round of bashing was undeserved, or that I should be forgiven. I really would like to thank those members how stepped out and called me on what I said. If they didn't I wouldn't have decided to try my hand at this. As to whether or not anything worthy comes of it,:shrug: It will have to be seen.
 
I look forward to trying your addon. :tiphat:
 
Back
Top