Especially when everyone has the bright idea to stage the games in the middle of one of the dirtiest cities in the world...In theory, yes. In practice, the Olympics are a joke.
Especially when everyone has the bright idea to stage the games in the middle of one of the dirtiest cities in the world...In theory, yes. In practice, the Olympics are a joke.
Especially when everyone has the bright idea to stage the games in the middle of one of the dirtiest cities in the world...
Are you speaking from experience? I have to ask, because I'm sorry, I spend a lot of time in Beijing. It is absolutely, positively NOT "one of the dirtiest cities in the world."
I count 12 here:
I don't know what you study for that, but the statistics of the the activities in Afghanistan or Iraq actually show that the US Army is far away from high effectivity. The reports are sounding more like the troops are often suffering from friction - Some people might even think, friendly fire is a US invention. Or that all efforts and good payment are not helping to keep the moral of the US soldiers high when deployed far away from home.
.I would, for the sake of the soldiers of your country, remember that you have not fought a regular army since 1991. The air strikes on Serbia not taken in account, which had been no show case of US superiority. You have no evidence, that the US army is fighting better in real combat situations as in training or against irregular troops
Do you have any evidence to support what you are saying?I would say, that even Georgian troops would be a major challenge for US troops, unless you have a clear superiority. By effectivity alone, you won't win a battle and should not rely on it. You can't rely on special forces and veteran units alone - the bulk of your fighting units will be regular units.
There is no better replacement for training deficits than real combat...or so history has told.The USA have a huge club with their army. But I would say, they have neither the will to do use it nor the understanding where to use it. And it will not get better, as better equipment (as the last ten years show) is no replacement for deficits in training.
I agree, it's another thing where the western media is making a tremendous fuss over something that isn't that bad. I don't know whether they're doing it because they want to make things more "dramatic" or because they want to push China a bit, either way its incredibly annoying.
I have also noticed such unfair animosity toward China in the media ...particularly the BBC. Quite ridiculous.
Well, there's a story there. back in '95-96, in the lead-up to Hong Kong's re-accession to the PRC, the BBC didn't "follow the rules" about how coverage could be conducted and what was and wasn't appropriate language to use when criticizing Beijing. As a result, the Beeb got cut off from all contact with PRC government officials, a ban that goes on to this day. And to this day, the BBC web site is blocked by the "Great Firewall;" even though you can get rabidly right-wing stuff on the net in China without any interference. Which is kind of ironic, since you apparently don't get to work for the BBC unless you're a true-blue, errh, I mean, true red, America-hating commie.
this thread is going all over the place.
Friendly fire is a fact of war. My brother was bombed three times by Dutch F-16's in Afghanistan....luckily, none of them could drop a 500 pounder for what's that worth. But then again, the National Guard has shot at my brother multiple times....once in close vicinity of an American base. But for one to say friendly fire is an American invention, then it is a revelation about one's ignoranc
Real combat situations? How is ambushes on convoys, IED's, snipers, urban guerrilla warfare, terrorist strongholds, etc. not real combat situations. Tell me how. The American military is getting the best kind of training: real combat experience. In the future, the Pentagon will be must better prepared in similar situations in the future.
And on the issue of threads going all over the place, I like it this way. It's more like a conversation instead of feeling like a sterile office meeting where only one topic can be discussed.
Ho-ho another russophobia wave on the rise!Alexander Lomaya, secretary of Georgia’s National Security Council, said the conflict arose because Russia sought to “thwart its neighbors’ movement toward Western society and Western values.”
“Russia has clearly decided to redraw the borders of the Eastern Europe map of the post-cold war situation,” Mr. Lomaya said. “If the world is not able to stop Russia here, then Russian tanks and Russian paratroopers can appear in every European capital.”