Poll What's Your Monitor's Aspect Ratio?

Ratio of Your Monitor(s)


  • Total voters
    65

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
I'm interested to see what's the most common aspect ratio of peoples' monitors, especially since 4:3 is becoming less common. (Disregard the 5:4)
 
Last edited:

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
16:9 is horror. Absolute horror.
When it was time for me to replace my 4:3 monitor, I went with 16:9. It's more standard and 4:3 is unavailable. (I also can fit a larger widescreen monitor in due to height constraints.)
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
What's wrong with it? Works for me.

Because all the manufacturers are making their monitors "HD standard" by removing vertical pixels from perfectly good monitors.

Compare: 1600*1200 vs 1680*1050, 1920*1200 vs 1920*1080, 1280*800 vs 1280*720

Also, computer monitors have pretty much been stagnating since the whole HD fad started, and now they're merging with TV monitors, and that drives up the prices of normal PC monitors with normal aspect ratios and respectable resolutions.

Progress has basically stopped at 2560*1600. I blame it on the consoles and TV popularising 16:9 and branding criminally low resolutions as "High definition".
 

Quick_Nick

Passed the Turing Test
Donator
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
4,088
Reaction score
204
Points
103
Location
Tucson, AZ
I like how HD video fits my screen "just right" though
(actually, I think my monitor is slightly larger than standard resolution)
Really, you only need higher definition for a larger (or closer) screen. My little laptop looks nice to me.
Just like how there's no point in ordering HD for the TV at my dad's house. It's an HD TV but the size of a small computer monitor and too far across the living room. (the old tv broke)
 
Last edited:

Loru

Retired Staff Member
Retired Staff
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
3,731
Reaction score
6
Points
36
Location
Warsaw
4:3 in main machine and 1st laptop and 16:9 in second laptop
 

Quick_Nick

Passed the Turing Test
Donator
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
4,088
Reaction score
204
Points
103
Location
Tucson, AZ
My laptop is 1366 x 768 (so, greater than 1080p, yet still 16:9)
 

jangofett287

Heat shield 'tester'
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,150
Reaction score
13
Points
53
my widescreen monitor has a native resolution of 1680x1050, a ratio of 16:10
 

Xyon

Puts the Fun in Dysfunctional
Administrator
Moderator
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Webmaster
GFX Staff
Beta Tester
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
6,927
Reaction score
795
Points
203
Location
10.0.0.1
Website
www.orbiter-radio.co.uk
Preferred Pronouns
she/her
Native 1080p (1920x1080), 16:9. It replaced an old CRT with a native of 1024x768 (4:3).
 

Mantis

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Mississauga, Ontario
My laptop's built in 17.3" screen is 16:9 (1920x1080) and my external 23" monitor is also 16:9 (1920x1080). While at home, I use the 23" as primary and extend the desktop to the laptop panel. On the road, it's just the laptop panel. HD movies look incredible on either one.
 

dbeachy1

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Orbiter Contributor
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
9,218
Reaction score
1,566
Points
203
Location
VA
Website
alteaaerospace.com
Preferred Pronouns
he/him
1920x1200 x2 FTW! [Plus a third 1600x1200 (4:3) off to the side I use for VS 2010 output/Task Manager/Winamp/GPU monitoring, etc.] Unfortunately all the new monitors are 1920x1080, though -- looks like 16:10 is on its way out. :(
 

Ross

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I feel a little bit spoiled...but I use a 32" 1080P LG TV that I bought on sale a while back. It works wonderfully as a monitor. I usually run orbiter in 1280x720 (because i only have a laptop) and it is beautiful :)
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
1920x1200 x2 FTW! [Plus a third 1600x1200 (4:3) off to the side I use for VS 2010 output/Task Manager/Winamp/GPU monitoring, etc.] Unfortunately all the new monitors are 1920x1080, though -- looks like 16:10 is on its way out. :(

I've also got an old 1600*1200 monitor relegated to a secondary role, now sitting vertically next to my main 2560*1600 monitor.
 

Keatah

Active member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,218
Reaction score
2
Points
38
I strongly prefer 16:10 and 4:3!
16:9 is an abomination, it's some sort of marketing pet project. HD just plain SuX0rZ..
 

jedidia

shoemaker without legs
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
10,889
Reaction score
2,141
Points
203
Location
between the planets
I feel a little bit spoiled...but I use a 32" 1080P LG TV that I bought on sale a while back. It works wonderfully as a monitor. I usually run orbiter in 1280x720 (because i only have a laptop) and it is beautiful :)

Spoiled? I'd run away screaming with such a low resolution on such a big screen. You must sit miles away from that thing to not make your eyes hurt! I guess it's nice if you have the space, but I find it hard to work on a monitor that stands too far in the distance, no matter how large. My Cellphone has pretty exactly half your resolution, on an area magnitudes smaller (that's the cheat with "HD-TV". Their actual resolution might be larger than of a common TV set, but for computer standards it's outright ridicoulus!)

21" 16:10 and 19" 4:3 here.
 
Top