Poll Will Google Lunar X Prize garner results?

Will Google Lunar X Prize garner results?


  • Total voters
    28

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
So what does the community think? I personally don't think it will happen.
 
Last edited:

Viper1

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Clearwater
A little language help, if you please: what does 'to garner' mean here?
garner = to collect; to gather; to accumulate; to store; to place in reserve

I take it to mean, will there be additional benefits gathered from the competition as in possible new technology or new ideas born of the competition. Similar to Spaceship One.
 

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
What I meant was will someone actually win the prize. Sorry for the confusion.

:cheers:
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
I don't see how it would help in private space flights anytime soon, but the idea should work. This is a robot, not a person.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,295
Reaction score
3,265
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
The key is to land a light payload. Probably that some radioelectric buggy car with a mini-cam on could do it, for probably less than 1kg. The batteries would have to be good, however ! The lander would include a transmitter that would relay the video feed to the Earth.

Today the surface of the Moon is fully mapped in high-res, and we even have precise elevation data. It should be possible to find a 500 meters long stripe of flat and not too rocky terrain.
 
Last edited:

eveningsky339

Resident Orbiter Slave
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Western Maine
If we landed humans on the moon using now 40-year-old technology, we can land a little robot on the moon using current methods.
 

River Crab

SpaceX Cheer Captain
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
945
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Washington, D.C. area
If we landed humans on the moon using now 40-year-old technology, we can land a little robot on the moon using current methods.
That's probably what Bush Jr. said. It's not that simple. There's no Cold War going on, nothing to prove, and we haven't the money to prove that nothing.

Edit: not to troll, I really hope so, but I don't want to expect anything. The first place I hear it will be here, though.
 
Last edited:

Izack

Non sequitur
Addon Developer
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
6,665
Reaction score
13
Points
113
Location
The Wilderness, N.B.
Is 20M$ even enough to fund such a project?

EDIT: Hahah, mega-dollars... :lol:
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
Yea, the reward is pretty small. You'd have to go for some of the bonuses and even then it's small.

I think it's possible, once you have a rover, to drive 5 km and take pictures or man made objects, but that would still get you only 40 million. Much less then you'd spend on the mission =/
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
Didn't SpaceShipOne cost more than its reward? (Ansari X Prize)
 

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Didn't SpaceShipOne cost more than its reward? (Ansari X Prize)


And there was a potential market for what they developed. This on the other hand is a dead end. I think originaly the intention was to spark a virtual tourism type market but it's a little early for that.

If someone could build a lander and the rover within the payload capacity of the Falcon 1e maybe it could happen but what I've seen from the teams doesn't look like they will do that.

:cheers:
 
Top