Humor Random Comments Thread

Dear child support,

My son has been repeating the same songverse over and over again for the last 30 minutes. I'm afraid he might have run into a halting problem.

How do I reboot him?
 
Did you try kill -s 1 on him?
 
Humans usually reboot themselves every day, especially the smaller ones don't have as big of a battery. Until then you'll have to wait. Although often enough reboots don't fix the problem.

If your human doesn't reboot himself after 30 hours he has run into a massive problem that you should fix. Known issues are psychological scarring, drugs, deadlines for work, school, or university projects and video games.
 
Humans usually reboot themselves every day, especially the smaller ones don't have as big of a battery.

I'd have to consider that a myth. The charge seems to be about the same, they're just discharging it faster. But usually recharching it faster, too...
 
NAME

baby -- create new process from two parents

SYNOPSIS

baby -sex [m|f] [-name name]

DESCRIPTION

baby is initiated when one parent process polls another server process through a socket connection in the BSD version or through pipes in the System V implementation. baby runs at low priority for approximately forty weeks and then terminates with a heavy system load. Most systems require constant monitoring when baby reaches its final stages of execution.

Older implementations of baby did not require both initiating processes to be present at the time of completion. In those versions the initiating process which was not present was awakened and notified of the results upon completion. It has since been determined that the presence of both parent processes result in a generally lower system load at completion, and thus current versions of baby expect both parent processes to be active during the final stages.

Successful completion of baby results in the creation and naming of a new process. Parent processes then broadcast messages to all other processes, local and remote, inform- ing them of their new status.

OPTIONS

-sex define the gender of the created process

-name assign the name name to the new process

EXAMPLES

baby -sex f -name Jacqueline

completed successfully on July 9, 1992 at 9:11pm. Jacque- line's vital statistics: 8 pounds 3 oz, 20 inches, long dark hair. The parent process, Kim Dunbar, is reportedly doing fine.

SEE ALSO

cigar(6), dump(5), cry(3).

BUGS

Despite its complexity, baby only knows one signal, SIGCHLD, (or SIGCLD in the System V implementation), which it uses to contact the parent processes. One or both parent processes must then inspect the baby process to determine the cause of the signal.

The sleep(1) command may not work as expected on either parent process for some time afterward, as each new instance of baby sends intermittent signals to the parent processes which must be handled by the parents immedi- ately.

A baby process will frequently dump core, requiring either or both parent processes to clean up after it.

Despite the reams of available documentation on invoking and maintaining baby, most parent processes are overwhelmed.

AUTHORS

From a man page by Joe Beck, ([email protected])
 
[BORING][INSPECTED][POSSIBLE SPAM][FILTERED] FW: FW: FW: Check this out!!!
 
baby -sex [m|f] [-name name]

Only two names? First you'll have problems in all spanish countries because they already have two last names. Then you'll have problems in all Eastern Slavic languages where they have a patronym. Then you'll have a problem with everyone who gives their children more than one first name, especially when it becomes something like John Ronald Reuel Tolkien.

- Someone with three first names
 
- Someone with three first names

You can use the name attribute multiple times. But for special names, you need to first set the proper environment variables of course, so the baby command is properly localized.

Also, while it is possible to pipe the baby command, you are not allowed to use it in batch jobs.
 
I see, so John Ronald Reuel wouldn't be a problem but different name structures like Nairo Quintana Rojas or Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy would need further work to implement properly.
 
Dear child support,

My son has been repeating the same songverse over and over again for the last 30 minutes. I'm afraid he might have run into a halting problem.

How do I reboot him?

"Child support" doesn't really work in English for "tech support for a child", given that its more usual meaning is "Kindesunterhalt".
 
I tried to connect the keyboard, but it seemed to upset him... :shifty:

He isn't Bluetooth? You got ripped off.

iu
 
This goes out to all the self-taught C++ Orbiter add-on developers here... This is how I feel when I read your code:

code_quality.png


;)
 
This goes out to all the self-taught C++ Orbiter add-on developers here... This is how I feel when I read your code:

code_quality.png


;)

Presumably, each critical frame relates to a particular language...?

N.
 
Presumably, each critical frame relates to a particular language...?

N.

No, it is really rather playing with the problem, that many self-"taught" programmers simply use copy and paste from various examples to solve their problems, without even understanding them and thus being able to use the actual solution, instead of the example code.

The result is as described... the more problems you solve that way in your program, the more different styles and, more important, different ad-hoc architectures creep into your program.

The final "style guide" line is another funny aspect there... Using a style guide and following a single uniform style in your code to improve readability is just one step to get away from this mess.

But the real big problem is not solved that way: That such self-"taught" programmers use solutions from tutorials and examples without actually understanding them. They neither understand the problem, nor do they understand the solution.

And that is something that I really dislike. Its OK to look at the examples. Its even OK to borrow code from them if its urgent (But never forget to refactor them later, its technical debt). But what you are expected to do with the example is to learn producing your own solutions to such problems. You don't teach yourself programming by copying example code. You only self-teach yourself copy and paste.
 
But the real big problem is not solved that way: That such self-"taught" programmers use solutions from tutorials and examples without actually understanding them. They neither understand the problem, nor do they understand the solution.

I actually consider it a skill to be able to do that. One I don't have, I might add. I am terribly unable to work with code I don't understand. As a result, I usually need a lot more time to be able to work with new libraries, while others are already getting results just by being able to not care how the stuff works and just putting bolts where the manual says to put them.
It's not so bad a skill to have, I think. At least I am feeling certain disadvantages from not having it.
 
Back
Top