Humor Random Comments Thread

Most of his stories deal with people being unsure of what reality is

The oracle is no different, there's just... no point to it that I remember. It's multiple personal stories in an alternate timeline where the Reich won the war and the US is occupied by Japan. The protagonists are a guy that fakes antiques for a living, some girl that is having a fling and goes on a road trip with a guy that turns out to be an asasin (Who then gets assasinated), and a Japanese director that is having hallucinations of the actual timeline bleeding into the timeline of the book. Somehow they all end up at the "oracle", who is some guy, and have a chat about something, but nothing profound enough for me to remember... While the stories and characterisations of the protagonists are pretty interesting as far as I remember, and the world building is pretty good, I can't for the life of me remember an actual narrative point to it all.
 
You're describing "The Man in the High Castle" :blink:

It must have different names in different countries... learn something new every day.


EDIT:

If you want to be REALLY confused read Valis and then the Exegenisis of Philip K. Dick

The oracle is no different, there's just... no point to it that I remember. It's multiple personal stories in an alternate timeline where the Reich won the war and the US is occupied by Japan. The protagonists are a guy that fakes antiques for a living, some girl that is having a fling and goes on a road trip with a guy that turns out to be an asasin (Who then gets assasinated), and a Japanese director that is having hallucinations of the actual timeline bleeding into the timeline of the book. Somehow they all end up at the "oracle", who is some guy, and have a chat about something, but nothing profound enough for me to remember... While the stories and characterisations of the protagonists are pretty interesting as far as I remember, and the world building is pretty good, I can't for the life of me remember an actual narrative point to it all.
 
Last edited:
You're describing "The Man in the High Castle"

Indeed. It's called "Das Orakel auf dem Berge" in german, and I didn't dig out the book to look up the original title.

If you want to be REALLY confused read Valis and then the Exegenisis of Philip K. Dick

You mean there's still weirder stuff? I don't even...
 
It's multiple personal stories in an alternate timeline where the Reich won the war and the US is occupied by Japan.

Such premises always amuse me. An alternate history in which the Reich wins in Europe and ends up in a Cold War with the US is imaginable (though probably not with Britain as a client state of the Reich, as often imagined). An alternate history in which homegrown fascists come to power in the US and/or the UK, resulting in an Axis victory is also imaginable. One in which the war is fought between the two sides as they existed historically and in which the US is occupied by any of the historical Axis powers is utterly laughable. The logistics just don't work. The two sides without the US involved had roughly equal GDPs. The US, on its own, had a GDP roughly equal to either side.

Of course, alternate histories often postulate that the Reich developed nuclear weapons first, but frankly, I don't see them outpacing the Manhattan project by any appreciable amount in any version of events where they persecute the Jews. The number of key figures in the development of the bomb that were Jewish-German exiles is really rather astonishing. The Reich ended up donating half of their theoretical physicists to the Allies.
 
Wellllllll I see what you mean but the book's not really "about" that.

SPOILER ALERT










.....





.....





....



it's really more about the characters realizing they live in a preposterous fictional reality. So in a way, it's more aligned with your viewpoint than one might initially imagine.
 
Not into rugby myself, but just in case it hasn't been reported in your Continent.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/42016805

Phish, we all know it is about cricket. The Womens side has retained the Ashes for Australia and while our keeping situation is strange, our bowlers are ready...

Also, I have no doubt how England will go in the Rugby League World Cup :P
 
Excellent, always good to get a balanced view...:)
 

iu
 
It's pretty clear that the pranksters get in trouble, simply to discourage imitators.

But reactions like these are somewhat concerning:
A woman who snapped pictures of the offending member told KREM 2 News that she was upset she might have to explain to her young children what it was.

Like... Ok, if you have an all-girls crew, there's a chance they've never seen a penis. If you got at least one boy, then he has one, and explaining becomes really simple.
My parents took the lazy approach to this topic, I guess. We just all walked around the house naked in the morning, there was never much need to explain in the first place...
 
I think what she's *really* concerned about, if her children are boys, is that this might set a bad example.

"Drawing penises isn't funny."

"The airplane thought it was funny. By the way, when I grow up, I wanna be a Navy pilot."
 
My parents took the lazy approach to this topic, I guess. We just all walked around the house naked in the morning, there was never much need to explain in the first place...

Well, this aren't the comfortably liberal 1980s anymore. Today you aren't supposed to have basic knowledge about the pin&socket-concept before you are at least 21. :lol:

---------- Post added at 12:10 ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 ----------

It's pretty clear that the pranksters get in trouble, simply to discourage imitators.

If he would not get into trouble, this would make such pranks far less epic. Doing this only makes sense if its making people outside your peer group upset.

I had to think about Terry Pratchetts novel "Lords&Ladies" again after seeing this sky: Here it's the landscape saying: "I've got a great big tonker"
 
Last edited:
I am in the middle of possibly the dumbest job compensation negotiation ever with my administration. I am a program coordinator on a contract over and above my day teaching duties. I had to write up a job description and submit my expectation for stipend and release time.

The wrinkle - I had this job dumped on me four years ago and I really don't want it anymore, and I'm tenured so I don't have to do it anymore. Yet there is no one remotely qualified or able to assume the duties. So the negotiations have gone like this over the last several weeks:

Administration: "We've read your expectations for stipend and release time, but we think they are unreasonable."

Me: "That's fine, I understand completely. Here is my resignation. Good luck."

Administration: "Oh no..wait, don't resign! Let us take another look at it and we'll get back to you at the next of the week."

They come back each week a few baby steps closer to what I requested. It's really failing to impinge on their minds that there can only be one outcome to this process. It is simultaneously funny yet sad.
 
I am in the middle of possibly the dumbest job compensation negotiation ever with my administration. I am a program coordinator on a contract over and above my day teaching duties. I had to write up a job description and submit my expectation for stipend and release time.

The wrinkle - I had this job dumped on me four years ago and I really don't want it anymore, and I'm tenured so I don't have to do it anymore. Yet there is no one remotely qualified or able to assume the duties. So the negotiations have gone like this over the last several weeks:

Administration: "We've read your expectations for stipend and release time, but we think they are unreasonable."

Me: "That's fine, I understand completely. Here is my resignation. Good luck."

Administration: "Oh no..wait, don't resign! Let us take another look at it and we'll get back to you at the next of the week."

They come back each week a few baby steps closer to what I requested. It's really failing to impinge on their minds that there can only be one outcome to this process. It is simultaneously funny yet sad.

A man with nothing to lose, nothing more dangerous.

---------- Post added 11-21-17 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 11-20-17 at 10:48 PM ----------

I'm thinking of writing a pointless blog post or thread about magical technologies in sci fi movies and the various flavors they come in.

For example, flying cars.

In the Blade Runner universe, as well as the 2015 "future" Delorean of Back to the Future, flying cars seem to have some sort of antigravity technology. In Blade Runner, jet propulsion is used only in special circumstances as a backup.

No explanation is ever given as to whether this tech allows cars to fly into space. If it works on the local gravity field, it should work as well at very high altitudes as it does at treetop level. Perhaps it requires nearby matter, such as the Earth's surface, to repel against? In which case we would call it a "repulsor lift" to borrow Star Trek lingo.

Contrast this with the flying cars seen in the Jetsons. These vehicles apparently work quite well at high altitude. High enough that we never see the planet's surface, come to think of it.

Also, George Jetson's car folds into a brief case so he can carry it to his desk at work...

...okay, it's late, and I have to work in the morning. I'm wasting time on this. Right?
 
I had to look into this.

https://scifi.stackexchange.com/a/6856

Spoiler: The surface appears in at least a few scenes!

Fascinating, I don't recall ever seeing that.

I still go with the Flintstones conspiracy theory: Jetsons live in the sky, while the Flintstones live on the ground in a zone of genetically engineered talking prehistoric animals to mine minerals for the Jetsons' society.

The people of Bedrock themselves, in fact, may be replicants with enhanced strength, which would explain Bam Bam Pebbles' great strength.
 
Back
Top