News NASA's Future: The News and Updates Thread

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
They have to get that VASMIR to the ISS. It's probably the most important point, we need this kind of engine.

There is a possibility that it could be launched on STS-135.

NASASpaceFlight: "STS-135: NASA managers discuss mission outline ahead of approval decision".
The MPLM remains as part of Atlantis' payload for the notional STS-135 mission, per IPT notes, although confirmation that discussions earlier in the year – for the addition of a LMC (Lightweight Multi-Purpose Carrier) in the aft of the orbiter’s payload bay – is becoming part of the mission’s planning.

More interesting will be the forward plan on what types of payloads could ride uphill on the LMC, with the obvious opportunity to aid the ISS' long-term future via ORUs, but also the potential to launch technology demonstration payloads.

"There have been discussions about further optimizing the mission by either adding or protecting for additional payloads, namely Goddard Space Flight Center technology demonstration payloads, or possibly ISS ORUs (if required) which could be integrated on a Lightweight Multi Purpose Experiment Support Structure (MPESS) Carrier (LMC) which would be installed in the cargo bay aft of the MPLM", continued the notes.

"(EVA) capability needs to be evaluated/considered to determine whether adding payloads to an LMC which require EVA for removal is viable option. The possibility of using the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM – Dextre) to remove FRAM (Flight Releasable Attachment Mechanism) based payloads from the LMC must also be understood."

"During the STS-335 Cargo Integration Review which was conducted early March, the decision was made to generate engineering products which protected for the late addition of an LMC to the flight. This decision has provided the Agency/Programs the flexibility to accommodate future payloads beyond the normal template date for adding payload."

Those payloads will be decided over the coming weeks, likely as part of the approval decision – although the late June 2011 flight may allow for launching the Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) engine - providing it can support its original scheduled – which is questionable. VASIMR would be tested by aiding the ISS altitude control – such as reboosts.

The engine – otherwise know as an Electro-thermal Plasma Thruster or Electro-thermal Magnetoplasma engine – uses radio waves to ionize and to heat propellant and magnetic fields to accelerate the resulting plasma to generate thrust.

However, due to the power requirements at the ISS, the engine will only be put through minimal testing. Several other working assumptions are also pre-empted for the notional mission, which will undergo evaluation during Monday’s meeting.


---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 PM ----------

SpaceRef: "CSF Lauds Senators Warner, Boxer, Tom Udall, and Brownback for Support of Commercial Spaceflight".
 

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Video: Senate Press Conference on NASA Reauthorization Bill.​
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,617
Reaction score
2,337
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
I think the my own thoughts are best described by the lyrics of a old punk song...

Revolution was written on our flags
Revolution was written in our face
We have witnessed what others can't even imagine
Revolution - we never wanted less

But that was so long ago
and now you don't recognize me at anymore

we have dreamed of a better world
we have imagined it to be easy
we have dreamed, it was a long night
I wish we had never woken up

Revolution, we wanted away from the masses
headlong into hell and back
Today you are working for the senate,
there is no longer aspiration in your eyes,
you say, we have to do, what we can do, and you feel good,
you make me sick.

we have dreamed of a better world
we have imagined it to be easy
we have dreamed, it was a long night
I wish we had never woken up

Revolution and a better world,
we have imagined revolution to be easy
we have dreamed, it was a long night
I wish we had never woken up
I wish we had never woken up


It is frustrating. :cry:
 

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Spaceref: NASA Authorization Act of 2010 - House of Representatives Draft

This draft is total garbage!!!

(4) For Exploration, $4,535,300,000 of which--

(A) $215,000,000 shall be for Human Research;

(B) $14,000,000 shall be for the Commercial Orbital Transportation System demonstration program;

(C) $50,000,000 shall be for commercial crew transportation-related activities;

(D) $4,156,300,000 shall be for the restructured exploration program described in section 202; and

(E) $100,000,000 shall be for the loan and loan guarantee program described in section 243.

(a) REQUIREMENTS.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop a plan to restructure the exploration program in existence prior to fiscal year 2011 in order to develop and demonstrate in an integrated manner and as expeditiously and efficiently as practicable a governmentally owned crew transportation system and heavy lift transportation system that satisfies the following requirements:

(1) The plan shall make maximum practicable use of the design, development, and test work com


25

pleted to date on the Orion crew exploration vehicle,

Ares I crew launch vehicle, heavy lift launch vehicle system, and associated ground support and exploration enabling systems and take best advantage of

investments and contracts implemented to date.

(2) The performance capabilities of the crew transportation system shall be phased in a manner that is consistent with available and anticipated resources, with the initial operational goal of having the crew transportation system developed under this section available to assure crewed access to low- Earth orbit and the ISS no later than December 31, 2015, in order to minimize the duration of the United States human space flight gap following the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet. If one or more United States commercial entities are certified to provide ISS crew transportation and rescue services, the crew transportation system developed under this section shall be available as a backup ISS crew transportation and rescue service as needed but shall not be utilized as the primary means of ISS crew transportation and rescue or otherwise compete with the commercial system for ISS crew transportation and rescue services.


26

(3) The crewed spacecraft element of the crew transportation system shall be evolvable on a continuous development path to support--

(A) ISS crew transportation and rescue capability;

(B) non-ISS missions to, from, and in low- Earth orbit; and

(C) human missions beyond low-Earth orbit.

(4) The crew transportation system shall be able to serve as a testbed for demonstrating operations concepts for exploration missions beyond low- Earth orbit, as well as for demonstrating technologies and carrying out risk reduction for the heavy lift launch vehicle development program.

(5) The crew transportation system shall have predicted levels of safety during ascent to low-Earth orbit, transit, and descent from low-Earth orbit that are not less than those required of the Ares I/Orion configuration that has completed program preliminary design review.

(6) In order to make the most cost-effective use of the funds available for the restructured exploration program, the Administrator shall pursue the expeditious and cost-efficient development of a heavy

lift launch system that utilizes the systems and flight and ground test activities of the crew transportation system developed under this section to the maximum extent practicable. In developing the heavy

lift launch vehicle--

Only $50 million for Commercial crew per year and basicaly a restructured Ares I and V. What a load of BS!!!!

The only thing remotely good is the Centrifuge.

What an epic fail!
 

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/policy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225900096

I may be mixing things up horribly, but I thought that the Senate had just rejected this...?

The House Science Committee has just rejected it some parts of it (an extra Shuttle flight), however, they have agreed with other parts of it (government-owned HLV development).

---------- Post added at 11:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 PM ----------

SpaceRef: "Letter to Senators Mikulski and Shelby from Apollo Astronauts Neil Armstrong, James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan, 20 July 2010".
 

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
In regards to the most recent letter from Niel and company, I wish they would have been more forthcomming as to which plan they prefer. Though I'm sure they like the house bill more for some reason. There is a world of difference between the two and for these three great humans not to see that is disapointing.
 

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Space Politics: "Loving NASA and other authorization bill reaction".

Space Politics: "Senate appropriators take up NASA spending bill today".

Florida Today's "The Flame Trench" Blog: "Senate meetings to set NASA policy, funding, continue today".

SpaceRef: "Shelby: CJS Bill Sustains Human Space Flight".

---------- Post added at 07:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:03 PM ----------

Florida Today's "The Flame Trench" Blog: "Senate subcommittee approves funding for NASA compromise".

Orlando Sentinel's "The Write Stuff" Blog: "NASA compromise takes small step forward".

---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 PM ----------

RIA Novosti: "Russia scoffs at NASA plans to send astronauts to asteroid, Mars by 2015".
NASA does not have capacities to build an asteroid mission spacecraft by 2015, the head of Roscosmos' manned flights department, Alexei Krasnov, said in the wake of Senate committee's approval of the bill that would allow NASA to create the spacecraft for deep space missions.

On July 15, NASA unveiled its plans to send astronauts to an asteroid and to Mars no later than 2015.

Earlier in April, U.S. President Barack Obama said in his speech on U.S. space industry development that the astronauts would likely to fly to an asteroid by 2025 and to Mars in the mid-2030s, but NASA was ready to boost the process saying the development of the spacecraft for manned deep space missions should be started as early as 2015.

"It is unreal by 2015," Krasnov said. "[They] probably won't be able to any sooner than by 2023-2025. They do not have the necessary spacecraft, and we will be ready with the project by 2018-2020".

I think the Russians are a bit confused about NASA's new bill! :p
The new NASA bill only wants a government-owned heavy lift launch vehicle + crewed spacecraft to be built by 2015. The bill does not say that they actually intend to fly them anywhere within that timeframe!

---------- Post added at 11:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 PM ----------

Space News: "Senate Panel Cuts Commercial Crew, Adds Funds for Orion and Heavy Lift".

NASA Watch: "A Missed Opportunity".

SpaceRef: "Media alert: Florida, Texas trying end-run for space shuttle".

---------- Post added 22nd Jul 2010 at 04:24 PM ---------- Previous post was 21st Jul 2010 at 11:35 PM ----------

Space Policy Online: "Senate Appropriations Markup of CJS Bill is at 2:30 PM EDT Thursday; Audio of Today's Subcommittee Markup Now Available".

Space Policy Online is providing live updates of the Senate Appropriations Markup of CJS Bill via its Twitter account.

---------- Post added at 07:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:34 PM ----------

The Senate Appropriations Markup of the CJS Bill is now underway. Here's a live webcast.

NASA Watch: "Showing NASA Some Love in the House".

SpaceRef: "Letter From California House Members to Rep. Bart Gordon Regarding NASA's FY 2011 Budget".

Florida Today: "Differing views for NASA advance".

Florida Today's "The Flame Trench" Blog: "House panel backs additional shuttle flight".
 
Last edited:

Keatah

Active member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,218
Reaction score
2
Points
38
At this rate it isn't going to happen. Now, nasa is always held back by cost-cutting and politics. an endeavor of the human condition that is totally artificial and self-serving. Humans won't do it unless there is money to be made.
 
Top