Launch News SpaceX Falcon 9 F3 COTS2+ Updates

T.Neo

SA 2010 Soccermaniac
Addon Developer
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
6,368
Reaction score
0
Points
0
What now? Dragon won't dock, it will dock, it won't dock, what?

Didn't NASA ok the docking to the station? Is Russia really that eager to flex their muscles in regard to the ISS? What do NASA and SpaceX say on this issue?

Or do we have to formulate conspiracy theories based on NASA's politics now... :dry:
 

orb

New member
News Reporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
14,020
Reaction score
4
Points
0
What now? Dragon won't dock, it will dock, it won't dock, what?
At the end of the RIA Novosti article:
Earlier Russia said it will not allow the SpaceX vehicle to dock with the ISS unless its safety is fully tested.

"We will not issue docking permission unless the necessary level of reliability and safety is proven," said Alexei Krasov, head of the human spaceflight department of Roscosmos. "So far we have no proof that this spacecraft duly comply with the accepted norms of spaceflight safety."
 

T.Neo

SA 2010 Soccermaniac
Addon Developer
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
6,368
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Who's rules of spacecraft safety? It wouldn't be allowed to fly and dock if NASA/the FAA didn't see it as compliant to safety rules. If Russia doesn't trust the American regulations it would be pretty annoying, as (as far as I understand) the US has to do essentially the same thing in regard to the safety of Soyuz.

The ATV and HTV spacecraft docked on the first go. Where was the non-docking rendezvous test for those vehicles?

Smells fishy to me, especially considering that these comments are made by Russia: Major Provider of Launch Services to the ISS. :dry:
 

orb

New member
News Reporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
14,020
Reaction score
4
Points
0
It isn't definite yet that Dragon will not dock. With the current change of COTS 2/3 demo to January/February everything can change and Dragon will be again safe for docking.
 

Ark

New member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
2,200
Reaction score
0
Points
0
It isn't definite yet that Dragon will not dock. With the current change of COTS 2/3 demo to January/February everything can change and Dragon will be again safe for docking.

Wait, they got bumped to 2012? :facepalm:
 

Tychonaut

Underexpanded
Donator
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
Points
0
I suspect our Russian friends are feeling a bit testy after their proven resupply craft was smeared across the landscape by their proven launch vehicle. Thus the need to remind everyone of the size of their Schwartz.
Hopefully NASA will whisper soothing words in their ear and SpaceX can get on with things.
 

orb

New member
News Reporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
14,020
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Wait, they got bumped to 2012? :facepalm:

From Orbinaut Pete's article:
The delay of Expedition 30 is expected to result in SpaceX’s C2/C3 Dragon demo mission being delayed to January or February 2012, since the originally scheduled launch date of 30th November would result in a 9th December ISS arrival date for Dragon, a time when only one trained US crewmember would be available on the ISS, when free-flyer capture and berthing operations require two trained crewmembers.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
I suspect our Russian friends are feeling a bit testy after their proven resupply craft was smeared across the landscape by their proven launch vehicle.

It is a proven rocket and a proven spacecraft. No other LV can compete with the number of successful launches accomplished. The only other unmanned cargo vehicles I know are the ATV and the HTV, and there have been so few launches that you can't even draw statistics.

I guess that this delay was expectable, since all the operations got delayed by roughly 2 months.
 

Tychonaut

Underexpanded
Donator
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
Points
0
It is a proven rocket and a proven spacecraft. No other LV can compete with the number of successful launches accomplished. The only other unmanned cargo vehicles I know are the ATV and the HTV, and there have been so few launches that you can't even draw statistics.

It's proven as much as anything in spaceflight is, but recent events remind us of how little that's worth when you're trying to reach orbit - the wrong thing fails and you wish you'd never even tried. I suspect the manufacturers and operators got complacent because of its good record. Now they're feeling embarrassed, and not happy SpaceX might upstage them by docking Dragon before they can get another Progress flying.
We can only hope cool heads will prevail in all countries, and the final decision will be made based on the facts, not egos.

If they end up unable to dock a Dragon because of lack of qualified personnel on ISS, it may work itself out anyway. SpaceX can still launch and perform a test flight of Dragon, gathering enough data to hopefully make everyone happy with docking on the next launch, and they can just point to the rulebook to explain why they can't dock this time.
 
Last edited:

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,296
Reaction score
3,270
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
I don't understand that theory of an "anti-SpaceX conspiration" that seems more and more popular. Things don't work that way. A flight like COTS 2/3 has to insert into a schedule planned years in advance. When there is an unexpected delay, like the failure of one of the world most reliable rocket (please note that the Progress-M has nothing to do with the incident), there's nothing you can do. And what failed is a sensor that cuts the engines if the flow is off-nominal.

A 2-months delay isn't a big drama, really... The russians will send a TMA in November and it's going to be OK.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,485
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Who's rules of spacecraft safety?

Well, if its about the Russian Spacecraft safety rules, somebody of SpaceX should take a sledgehammer before final integration and hammer the capsule a bit, until it is properly pre-tuned by Russian engineering. :facepalm:
 

Grover

Saturn V Misfire
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Ascension Island
at the end of the day, the ISS needs a few craft ready to re-supply it (long term) and be ready to evacuate the crew.

the russians do indeed control the second part with the Progress (unless things have changed and im not aware) but if SpaceX CAN and WILL launch a better craft to re-supply the station, Roscosmos will be far better off.

understandably, they were unsure at first. i dont blame them, its fair to deny them docking if they arent sure about how safe the craft is, but they have to give a definitive answer soon, either a definite yes or a definite no.

if the dragon works as well as we'd hope, they it will end up docked, becuase the more available craft there are to maintain the station, the less chance there is of a catastrophic problem, and an end to the constant manning of the ISS (and it is so far never unmanned for an incredibly long time)

and anyway, i just docked a dragon to the ISS, so it clearly works :p
 

Jarvitä

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Serface, Earth
It should also be noted, Dragon is the only unmanned re-supply vehicle that is designed to, and has, in fact, survived a re-entry. This means it could also potentially be used as a rescue vehicle, and, once it's man-rated, to transport the entire ISS crew in one go. The Russians' delaying SpaceX is obvious self-interest.
 

Tychonaut

Underexpanded
Donator
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
Points
0
I don't understand that theory of an "anti-SpaceX conspiration" that seems more and more popular.
I, for one, never suggested there's a conspiracy. Just people feeling upset because their rocket failed, leading to panic in the media about abandoning ISS to its fate. Understandably, they may wish for their competitors to feel their pain.

A 2-months delay isn't a big drama, really... The russians will send a TMA in November and it's going to be OK.
Most likely yes, and when the next Dragon is launched, it will most likely dock with ISS, and all will be well.
 

Zachstar

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
654
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Shreveport, Louisiana
Website
www.ibiblio.org
I do doubt for a second that there are elements in Russia's space economy that are doing their utmost to convince their superiors to delay SpaceX as much as possible. But I highly doubt its even a large portion of the agency.
 

anemazoso

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
I am with the Russians regarding this NASAs pet project SpaceX .

Booo. Give them a chance. The "Gun Club" as Stephen Baxter called NASA in the Manifold series has had a stranglehold on spaceflight for the last 30 yrs trying to justify the enormous cost of the Shuttle. The things that SpaceX is doing to the market by itself (without even fielding an operational system) is one of the best things to happen. Look at Boeing, they are honestly trying to compete with SpaceX and have so far made a lot of progress on very little money. In my opinion Boeing and ULA would still be trying to squeeze out welfare from NASA in the form of cost-plus contracts. And to top it all off we are probably going to get a man rated Atlas V out of all of this.

The fact is this whole commercialization process should have been started in the late '80 or early '90s but our political system wouldn't let that happen and it barely is letting it happen now (and not without a huge fight).

SpaceX, Armadillo, Blue Origins and the like are exactly what you get in the land of the dreamer and the home of the back yard tinkerer.

:cheers:
 
Top